Actually the whole weiner case is sad too. I doubt any country in thw world would have
I have been trying to figure this out: did he have sex with any of his accusers? or he lucked out every time
Conservative hero Roy Moore diddles 14 year old girls
- Thread starter gwb-trading
- Start date
Well, two allegations do implicate actual sex crimes. One being child molestation of a 14 year old and another being attempted rape.
"Attempted rape" sounds a lot like a country boy trying to make out. The woman claims he tried to kiss her, etc. in his car.
I know you have a daily quota of posts to make, but you trolls actually harm women with legitimate claims of sexual harassment and assault. Every unwanted kiss or hug is not a sex crime.
Oh, boy.
When phony Gloria Allred's accuser's stepson gets into the mix.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ccuser-accusations-one-hundred-percent-a-lie/
Does the stepson have a dog in the fight? Nope.
When phony Gloria Allred's accuser's stepson gets into the mix.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ccuser-accusations-one-hundred-percent-a-lie/
Does the stepson have a dog in the fight? Nope.
Allred on Whether Yearbook Signature Is Forgery: ‘We’re Not Addressing’ and Analysis Should Be Done in Professional Setting
by BREITBART TV16 Nov 2017351
Wednesday, on “The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer” on CNN, Gloria Allred, the attorney for Roy Moore accuser Beverly Nelson, said that she’s not addressing whether the yearbook signature her client put forward is legitimate, but will allow it to be examined in a professional setting.
Blitzer asked, “Can you say flatly to our viewers right now, Gloria, that the signature, what he wrote in that yearbook in 1977, according to her, can you say flatly that was not a forgery?”
Allred answered, “Well, all I’m saying is we will permit an independent examiner of the writing to look at exemplars of [the] former judge…we will allow all of this to be asked and answered at the hearing.”
After Blitzer pressed, Allred responded, “Well, all I’m saying is we’re not denying, we’re not admitting, we’re not addressing. We will not be distracted, and we will pursue a just result for our client.” She added that she wants analysis of the signature “done in a professional setting to the extent possible. That’s the only setting in which people can testify under oath and that’s what we think is most important.”
by BREITBART TV16 Nov 2017351
Wednesday, on “The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer” on CNN, Gloria Allred, the attorney for Roy Moore accuser Beverly Nelson, said that she’s not addressing whether the yearbook signature her client put forward is legitimate, but will allow it to be examined in a professional setting.
Blitzer asked, “Can you say flatly to our viewers right now, Gloria, that the signature, what he wrote in that yearbook in 1977, according to her, can you say flatly that was not a forgery?”
Allred answered, “Well, all I’m saying is we will permit an independent examiner of the writing to look at exemplars of [the] former judge…we will allow all of this to be asked and answered at the hearing.”
After Blitzer pressed, Allred responded, “Well, all I’m saying is we’re not denying, we’re not admitting, we’re not addressing. We will not be distracted, and we will pursue a just result for our client.” She added that she wants analysis of the signature “done in a professional setting to the extent possible. That’s the only setting in which people can testify under oath and that’s what we think is most important.”
Are you clueless? She as much as admitted it was a forgery. They copied it off the judicial decree his assistant signed for him using her initials. Ooops.
The chemical composition analysis would be the best possible validation of a recent forgery. Otherwise it is simply he said / she said -- along with conflicting "professional" opinions about handwriting analysis and context.
Yes of course, have the FBI crime lab look at it, oops they are corrupt too. Allred is not going to allow any kind of professional examination. She said as much and we all know why not.
I am somewhat embarrassed for her. She saw this neat driveby slime job they did on Moore and thought it would be a good opportunity to pile on and regain some of her lost credibility. Only now, due to shoddy workmanship, she looks like an even bigger crook and fool, and she may have wrecked the whole setup.
This is just a warning of what can happen when amateurs try this kind of dirty trick on their own. Leave it to the experts at the DNC and CIA next time.