Quote from Burtakus:
Food for thought; Which is the only species on the planet that violates natures rule of survival of the fittest. Not only do they violate this rule, but they exceedingly do everything possible to ensure that the least fit survive.
Yeah, yeah, humans.
Problem is, the misuse of darwins terminology in this context, as it so frequently is.
It never refered to "fittest", like a track athlete, nor fittest like a dominant lion, nor fittest in the sense of dominating other species, or being on top of the food chain.
Darwin meant "fitting" in better with an environment, "fitting" an ecological niche, adaptability to change ,"fitting" different envoronments, and being around for the long haul due to these measures, potentially, dare i say it, "evolving" as a species, and as a solid stayer, a competitor with its own niche, in an ecosystem.
Humans have failed all these measures, sure.
Humanity isnt "fitting" an environment , (ie survival of fittest) its more like curve fitting.
Unless you were talking about antechinus.
