Comp Sci prof who doesn't think much of crypto

deaddog has been (playing) stupid on this concept of trading when it comes to Bitcoin

Bitcoin has over $20B of daily trading volume on worldwide exchanges, but he's too dumb to understand it, somehow

Good luck to you, deaddog will waste your time spinning the simplest things around
We are not discussing how it's traded we are discussing why it is or isn't a ponzi.
 
Xbased on greater fool theory, but you can make the EXACT same argument about growth-stocks.

Yes. So? Nobody bought TSLA, because they think it is worth more than Toyota and Ford, they bought it because they thought they can time the top and pass it on to the greater fool. Some was able, most didn't.
 
Last edited:
We are not discussing how it's traded we are discussing why it is or isn't a ponzi.

Oh really? So you admit to stating something you know and understand to be a lie?? You admit that you are a malicious liar??

upload_2022-7-11_10-46-34.png
 
We can argue the same thing back and forth. Basically, no one's going to change their bear/bull opinion on crypto here.

No need to argue, there are things called facts. Just because there are shitty and/or overvalued stocks, that doesn't mean that most/all of crypto isn't shit. That simple.
 
1) It is not a Ponzi scheme.

It is but if you want to ride the schemantics horse, let's call it kwonzi. In a kwonzi, early investors are paid off by latecomers who keep pushing up the price of the crypto. Without constant incoming cashflow the system collapses. Sounds like a ponzi to me, but again, I am a nice guy so let's stick to kwonzi. I am sure you know where the name came from. :)
 
Geez !! Look at the whole conversation.
That's what I like about you John. When you don't have an answer you attack the poster.

That's what I like about you, deaddog, when caught red-handed try to deflect and ignore the very lie that you keep repeating over and over and over and over
 
Back
Top