And that lie would be??That's what I like about you, deaddog, when caught red-handed try to deflect and ignore the very lie that you keep repeating over and over and over and over
And there you go again. You're nothing if not predictable. In vague terms, of course.If nothing else, you can always count on Frederick Foreskin for an asinine, drive-by comment that completely misses the point!
But you have to find someone to buy it from you. New money comes in to pay the existing investors. That has to come from someone else. Bitcoin doesn't have any income.
That fits the deifinition of a ponzi.
Commodities have an inherent value in that there is an end use.
And that lie would be??
That bitcoin meets the definition of a ponzi?
That there is no practicle way to value bitcoin?
That there is no downside to cash when the price of an asset is falling?
That bitcoin requires a greater fool to keep increasing in value?
That bitcoin is having trouble being accepted as a currency?
That bitcoin is a secure store of value?
Or that by a certain date bitcoin will be worth a million dollars?
Nobody is refruting the claim that bitcoin is a get rich ponzi scheme.
Funny, I was going to suggest the same thing to you.Get your yeehaw's in now, for this too will pass.
Groovy. Keep buying with both hands while supplies last!There are tons of people "refruting" that claim. lol. At this point I could write a book about it but it would fall on def ears in this forum so I won't bother. The technical implications of bitcoin are covered extensively and you can read about it anywhere. But the punchline is that the supply is falling (yes, really) and always will. I've seen other assets do this, such as pink diamonds, and the price is explosive. Most people are accustomed to assets like stocks, metals, real estate, lumber, etc. With all of these supply can increase as demand increases. Bitcoin won't behave like those other assets.
You will also notice that the biggest critics of crypto know the least about it technically. They can't tell you how blockchain works. This is precisely the pattern I remembered with the Internet in the 1990s. Old men who thought they knew everything couldn't talk to you about it, yet they were certain no one would ever use the Internet for anything other than a toy.
The technical implications of bitcoin
