Comey the Clown: Lock him up!!

Trump accuses James Comey of breaking the law — based on a misleading Fox News report:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ading-fox-news-report/?utm_term=.724b6f64bc94

Once again, Trump relies on "intelligence" info from Fox & Friends. What could possibly go wrong?
haha. Keep on drinking the Koolaid!

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...s-on-trump-conversations-contained-classified
Comey’s private memos on Trump conversations contained classified material
BY JOHN SOLOMON - 07/09/17 08:12 PM EDT 10,915
28,074

thehill_75x27.png

Comey’s private memos on Trump conversations contained classified material
TheHill.com

More than half of the memos former FBI Director James Comey wrote as personal recollections of his conversations with President Trump about the Russia investigation have been determined to contain classified information, according to interviews with officials familiar with the documents.

This revelation raises the possibility that Comey broke his own agency’s rules and ignored the same security protocol that he publicly criticized Hillary Clinton for in the waning days of the 2016 presidential election.

Comey testified last month he considered the memos to be personal documents and that he shared at least one of them with a friend. He asked that friend, a lawyer at Columbia University, to leak information from one memo to the news media in hopes of increasing pressure to get a special prosecutor named in the Russia case after Comey was fired as FBI director.



“So you didn’t consider your memo or your sense of that conversation to be a government document?” Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) asked Comey on June 8. “You considered it to be, somehow, your own personal document that you could share to the media as you wanted through a friend?”
“Correct,” Comey answered. “I understood this to be my recollection recorded of my conversation with the president. As a private citizen, I thought it important to get it out.”

Comey insisted in his testimony he believed his personal memos were unclassified, though he hinted one or two documents he created might have been contained classified information.

“I immediately prepared an unclassified memo of the conversation about Flynn and discussed the matter with FBI senior leadership,” he testified about the one memo he later leaked about former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

He added, “My view was that the content of those unclassified memorialization of those conversations was my recollection recorded.”

But when the seven memos Comey wrote regarding his nine conversations with Trump about Russia earlier this year were shown to Congress in recent days, the FBI claimed all were, in fact, deemed to be government documents.

While the Comey memos have been previously reported, this is the first time there has been a number connected to the amount of memos the ex-FBI chief wrote.

Four of the memos had markings making clear they contained information classified at the secret or confidential level, according to officials directly familiar with the matter.

A spokesman for the FBI on Sunday declined to comment.

FBI policy forbids any agent from releasing classified information or any information from ongoing investigations or sensitive operations without prior written permission, and it mandates that all records created during official duties are considered to be government property.

“Unauthorized disclosure, misuse, or negligent handling of information contained in the files, electronic or paper, of the FBI or which I may acquire as an employee of the FBI could impair national security, place human life in jeopardy, result in the denial of due process, prevent the FBI from effectively discharging its responsibilities, or violate federal law,” states the agreement all FBI agents sign.

It adds that “all information acquired by me in connection with my official duties with the FBI and all official material to which I have access remain the property of the United States of America” and that an agent “will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.”

Comey indicated in his testimony the memos were in his possession when he left the bureau, leaving him in a position to leak one of them through his friend to the media. But he testified that he has since turned them over to Robert Mueller, a former FBI chief who is now spearheading the investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the presidential race.

It is not clear whether Comey as director signed the same agreement as his agents, but the contract is considered the official policy of the bureau. It was also unclear when the documents were shown to Congress whether the information deemed secret or confidential was classified at the time Comey wrote the memos or determined so afterward, the sources said.

Congressional investigators had already begun examining whether Comey’s creation, storage and sharing of the memos violated FBI rules, but the revelation that four of the seven memos included some sort of classified information opens a new door of inquiry into whether classified information was mishandled, improperly stored or improperly shared.

That was the same issue for which the FBI investigated Clinton, a former secretary of State in the Obama administration, in 2015 and 2016 under Comey. Clinton used a private email server during her tenure that at times contained classified material.

Comey ultimately concluded in July 2016 that Clinton’s email practices were reckless, but that he could not recommend prosecution because FBI agents had failed to find enough evidence that she intended to violate felony statutes prohibiting the transmission of classified information through insecure practices. Clinton at the time was the Democratic nominee for president.

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of the classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information," he said in a decision panned by Republicans and embraced by Democrats.

Now, congressional investigators are likely to turn their attention to the same issues to determine if Comey mishandled any classified information in his personal memos.

In order to make an assessment, congressional investigators will have to tackle key questions, such as where and how the memos were created, including whether they were written on an insecure computer or notepad; where and how the memos were stored, such as inside Comey's home, in a briefcase or on an insecure laptop; whether any memos were shown to private individuals without a security clearance and whether those memos contained any classified information; and when was it determined by the government that the memos contained classified information, before Comey took them and shared one or after.

One avenue for answering those questions is for a panel like Senate Intelligence, House Intelligence or Senate Judiciary to refer the matter to the Justice Department’s internal watchdog, the inspector general, or to the director of national intelligence and its inspector general, aides said.
 
haha. Keep on drinking the Koolaid!

Four of the memos had markings making clear they contained information classified at the secret or confidential level, according to officials directly familiar with the matter.
.

Guess who marked them? And guess who leaked the UNCLASSIFIED memo knowingly. Can you guys even read.

Who is drinking the kool aid now?
 
The cult is dancing based on that 'anonymous' report, they don't even know which memo was classified and whether the leaked memo was classified or not. Right wing hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Ooohhhh, now you have an issue with an 'anonymous' source/report.
 

Okay. So say a person is an OCA. That OCA has the plans for a to-be-built nuclear submarine. The plans haven't been classified. The OCA releases the plans online. That OCA is free from prosecution?

That is not how the law works.


Correct.

First of all, the information was not Comey's. It was written upon information and computers that belonged to the United States government/FBI at the time.

Second of all, releasing information that allegedly was not classified and releasing information that was not presented for classification as required before releasing are two vastly different things.

For those who are moving slowly here, I will repeat. It was not his information, and he cannot allege that it was not classified by circumventing the required submission for classification review. This was a direct conversation with the President of the United States while he was a government employee and he revealed the content and the discussion and blow by blow action. He does not get to decide on his own.

He is known leaker and needs to be locked up.
 
I predict boom times for white collar defense lawyers in Washington, DC. At this rate, we may even run out of lawyers to appoint as Special Counsel to investigate this mess.

By my count, Special Counsel are clearly needed to investigate the following scandals:

1. The incompetently conducted Hillary email investigation, including the interference therein by Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton. Key questions would include why Hillary aides were immunized and why compulsory process was not used to gain access to their computers.

2. Comey's admitted leaking. Comey seems to have been an active participant in the attempt to take down a duly elected president. He should be prosecuted to deliver a message to future FBI Directors that such conduct will not be tolerated. Disbarment and prison should do the job. Given what a weasel he is, he may well roll over on other participants.

3. Violation of conflict of interest rules by FBI Deputy Director McCabe. In the midst of the Hillary and Russian collusion investigations, Hillary surrogate Terry MacAulife and a democrat group donated $750,000 to McCabe's wife, who was running for a minor state level office. McCabe did not recuse himself, an obvious violation of conflict rules.

4. Hacking of DNC computer system. Despite using this breach as an excuse to stage a coup against the president, no law enforcement agency has ever examined the actual computer system. They instead relied on the claims of a private company with a dubious record and troubling ownership. New claims have surfaced indicating that at least some of the files were most likely obtained by direct access to the computers, ie by using a flash drive, rather than hacking. Given the fact that a staffer was murdered, one would think the DNC would be eager to assist law enforcement but instead they have put up the typical Clinton stonewall.

5. Collusion between the Hillary campaign and Russian intelligence. The same group that enticed Trump Jr to a meeting also worked for the notorious DNC opposition research firm that apparently commissioned the phony piss-Trump dossier. Podesta himself had repeated contacts with Russian figures. It is beginning to appear that team Hillary had a backup plan if the election went badly which involved planting false evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians.

6. The unmasking of Trump campaign officials by the obama White House.

7. The orchestrated leaking of national security information designed to undermine the new Trump administration. We already know several figures who were involved. Simple matter to put them all in front of a grand jury and force them to either spill the beans or take the Fifth.

I am sure there are more, but this would be the minimum. Finally, Trump should use the Comey revelations as an excuse to discharge Mueller and probably the Deputy Ag who appointed him.
 
I predict boom times for white collar defense lawyers in Washington, DC. At this rate, we may even run out of lawyers to appoint as Special Counsel to investigate this mess.

By my count, Special Counsel are clearly needed to investigate the following scandals:

1. The incompetently conducted Hillary email investigation, including the interference therein by Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton. Key questions would include why Hillary aides were immunized and why compulsory process was not used to gain access to their computers.

2. Comey's admitted leaking. Comey seems to have been an active participant in the attempt to take down a duly elected president. He should be prosecuted to deliver a message to future FBI Directors that such conduct will not be tolerated. Disbarment and prison should do the job. Given what a weasel he is, he may well roll over on other participants.

3. Violation of conflict of interest rules by FBI Deputy Director McCabe. In the midst of the Hillary and Russian collusion investigations, Hillary surrogate Terry MacAulife and a democrat group donated $750,000 to McCabe's wife, who was running for a minor state level office. McCabe did not recuse himself, an obvious violation of conflict rules.

4. Hacking of DNC computer system. Despite using this breach as an excuse to stage a coup against the president, no law enforcement agency has ever examined the actual computer system. They instead relied on the claims of a private company with a dubious record and troubling ownership. New claims have surfaced indicating that at least some of the files were most likely obtained by direct access to the computers, ie by using a flash drive, rather than hacking. Given the fact that a staffer was murdered, one would think the DNC would be eager to assist law enforcement but instead they have put up the typical Clinton stonewall.

5. Collusion between the Hillary campaign and Russian intelligence. The same group that enticed Trump Jr to a meeting also worked for the notorious DNC opposition research firm that apparently commissioned the phony piss-Trump dossier. Podesta himself had repeated contacts with Russian figures. It is beginning to appear that team Hillary had a backup plan if the election went badly which involved planting false evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians.

6. The unmasking of Trump campaign officials by the obama White House.

7. The orchestrated leaking of national security information designed to undermine the new Trump administration. We already know several figures who were involved. Simple matter to put them all in front of a grand jury and force them to either spill the beans or take the Fifth.

I am sure there are more, but this would be the minimum. Finally, Trump should use the Comey revelations as an excuse to discharge Mueller and probably the Deputy Ag who appointed him.
ThisJubilantAsianwaterbuffalo.gif
 
5. Collusion between the Hillary campaign and Russian intelligence. The same group that enticed Trump Jr to a meeting also worked for the notorious DNC opposition research firm that apparently commissioned the phony piss-Trump dossier. Podesta himself had repeated contacts with Russian figures. It is beginning to appear that team Hillary had a backup plan if the election went badly which involved planting false evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians.

Might want to update the talking points

 
Back
Top