Colbert's Shocking Attack on Trump Leaves Media Stumbling

The difference here is one's a comedian and the other's running for the highest office in the land. I really don't understand this PC culture where people get offended over what comedians say. Happened when Daniel Tosh joked about rape, happened when Louis CK joked about pedophilia, happens all the time.


Yeah i cant stand the people who get offended by standupcomics, the whole point about comedy is to make jokes about stereotypes, or patterns of behaviour that everyone understands.

I cant even imagine the shitstorm that would have came down on Dave Chapelle if Chapelle show was released in 2017, and its probably one of the funniest series of all time.
 
Nice of you to say, but I'm not looking for you to respect my view. What would be nice is for you to put aside your partisanship for just a little while and be fair in your interpretations.

Saying Colbert's comment that the President of the United States uses his mouth as a cock holder for Putin is "nowhere as vulgar" as Trump saying "grab 'em by the pussy" shows a clear cut example of biased and partisan opinion.. If you would just equally condemn and be a bit more fair once in a while, you'd have a lot more credibility around here.
If I were to consider you the arbiter of my credibility, then I would certainly give more weight to your opinion than I do now. What I really wanted to say is that I respect your opinion regarding Colbert's brilliant put down of our asshole, Putin cock-sucking, President Donald Trump, despite not agreeing with you. I am happy that I didn't say exactly what I was thinking.
 
Last edited:
I don't see a problem with being offended by what a standup comedian might say, as comedy can be weaponized, and used as a mask for deep hatred, or some other intention to brainwash a stupid audience. How stupid do some of these "comedians" think we are? That's what's so offensive.

Bill Cosby thought we were really stupid, and still does. Snoop Dog thinks we are stupid. So when Snoop Dog roasted Donald Trump a few years ago, along with several other unfunny "comedians", i didn't think it was funny, and wanted to push a reset button when comedians really knew how to roast, back when Dean Martin, and friends, were roasting each other, especially Don Rickles.

There's a big difference between a Colbert, and a Don Rickles. Colbert really HATES Trump. Rickles could manage to insult anybody, without actually hating them, or coming off as hating them.

It's this hatred that get's people like Colbert in hot water, as they manage to insult large swaths of huge demographics, just to get a zinger into one man.

It's low-brow brow-beating. Neanderthal. Brainwashing. Weaponized stupidity.

It's offensive to be given such a graphic image of something you know isn't true.

That's what the lying media has been doing. That's what's offensive. How stupid do they think we are?

Basically, he's saying, I want you to hate Trump as much as i do by finding a dishonest graphic image funny, using a dishonest delivery (opinion/propaganda disguised as comedy), as i shove it into your brain like a dumpster in a stinking alley.
 
Last edited:
If I were to consider you the arbiter of my credibility, then I would certainly give more weight to your opinion than I do now. What I really wanted to say is that I respect your opinion regarding Colbert's brilliant put down of our asshole, Putin cock-sucking, President Donald Trump, despite not agreeing with you. I am happy that I didn't say exactly what I was thinking.

Say whatever you want, Piezoe. It cannot possibly be more screwed up that what you've already said around here. So don't hold back on my account - show us how completely off-the-wall you are.
 
I don't see a problem with being offended by what a standup comedian might say, as comedy can be weaponized, and used as a mask for deep hatred, or some other intention to brainwash a stupid audience. How stupid do some of these "comedians" think we are? That's what's so offensive.

Bill Cosby thought we were really stupid, and still does. Snoop Dog thinks we are stupid. So when Snoop Dog roasted Donald Trump a few years ago, along with several other unfunny "comedians", i didn't think it was funny, and wanted to push a reset button when comedians really knew how to roast, back when Dean Martin, and friends, were roasting each other, especially Don Rickles.

There's a big difference between a Colbert, and a Don Rickles. Colbert really HATES Trump. Rickles could manage to insult anybody, without actually hating them, or coming off as hating them.

It's this hatred that get's people like Colbert in hot water, as they manage to insult large swaths of huge demographics, just to get a zinger into one man.

It's low-brow brow-beating. Neanderthal. Brainwashing. Weaponized stupidity.

It's offensive to be given such a graphic image of something you know isn't true.

That's what the lying media has been doing. That's what's offensive. How stupid do they think we are?

Basically, he's saying, I want you to hate Trump as much as i do by finding a dishonest graphic image funny, using a dishonest delivery (opinion/propaganda disguised as comedy), as i shove it into your brain like a dumpster in a stinking alley.

Could it be that Colbert hates Trump as much as half of the US hates Obama??
 
Step back and ask yourself, what exactly has Trump done to engender this level of manic hatred? He wanted our existing immigration laws enforced, he didn't want to let in hordes of muslims claiming bogus refugee status, he wanted trade deals renegotiated to benefit us and he was skeptical of starting WW III with Russia.

That's pretty much it. A few women claimed he hit on them in singles bars in Manhattan in the 1980's. He made a private remark that as a celeb, women would allow him to grab their genitals.

Somehow this makes him the most hideous man ever to run for public office in the US and unfit to breathe much less be president. Liberal icon FDR schemed to get us into WW II, threw japanese-americans into concentration camps and threw americans who protested his war into jail on bogus sedition charges. Republican icon Abe Lincoln suspended habeas corpus, which was dictatorial at best, and was guilty of a panoply of war crimes, including authorizing a genocidal war on defenseless southern civilian women and children. There are monuments to both these monsters in DC.

There is no real discussion among the left of actual issues. It is all ad hominem hyperbole, orchestrated by the media to rile up the democrats' low IQ voter base and to frighten normal people from supporting Trump or his policies.
 
If you use your brain and think you will see... he did.

He gave them the cover of a treaty to continue their program to the point where Iran will have a zero breakout time to create their nuclear bombs.
Then he gave them the money and the uranium to pursue that goal.

(stop lying and covering for this sick deal... that is going to be worse than north korea for the next president or the president after that. )


Whereas in absence of the treaty the world could have gone in their and stopped them...
Now it will be almost ultra vires or a violation of international law to stop them as long as they stay in compliance. How will Isreal stop them with this treaty in place. Imagine Trump telling the world that Obama's treaty was void?

Obama screwed over the world with this one. And you should stop covering for him as there is a strong chance Iran will use those bombs for genocide.





That is not the same thing as Obama or The Iran nuclear deal giving them "the right to build nukes" as you keep stating.
 
Last edited:
Could it be that Colbert hates Trump as much as half of the US hates Obama??

I ignored Obama for eight years, and that's what i expect you Hillary supporters to do for the next eight.

Questioning Obama's place of birth is not about hate, it's about the Constitution, and proper vetting.

Questioning immigration is not about hate, it's about the Constitution and proper vetting.
 
Whereas in absence of the treaty the world could have gone in their and stopped them...
Now it will be almost ultra vires or a violation of international law to stop them as long as they stay in compliance.


Staying in compliance means not building nuclear weapons,as the treaty specifically forbids Iran from building nuclear weapons.This treaty makes it better for The US if Iran builds nuclear weapons as Iran not only signed a treaty with The US not to build nuclear weapons but with the United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany as well.
 
Back
Top