Colbert's Shocking Attack on Trump Leaves Media Stumbling

I give you information... over and over and you come back with that fact checker bullshit? That is proof of insanity right there.
Go do some real research... see what the experts are saying.
See the facts... combine that with the recent approval of uranimum going to Iran and Hillary selling it to the Russians and you have something only a crooked Pravda press would not be investigating.

This was the biggest sell out of world security in history.


a 10 year moratorium and then the ability to be a threshold breakout state in 10 years... is genocidal insanity.

giving them uranimum and the cash... is giving the the means and the legal cover to have the bomb in 10 years.

it was genocidal and will destabilize the middle east worse than what we see in north korea.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...6-metric-tons-of-uranium-as-a-thank-you-gift/

Barack Obama’s administration, with the help of the rest of the P5+1 signatories of the Iran deal, has gifted Iran with enough uranium to make 10 simple nuclear bombs, a nuclear arms expert said Monday

The transfer of 116 metric tons of uranium will come from Russia as a “thank you” in exchange for Iran’s export of tons of reactor coolant, the Associated Press reported in an exclusive.

David Albright, whose Institute of Science and International Security often briefs U.S. lawmakers on Iran’s nuclear program, says the shipment could be enriched to enough weapons-grade uranium for more than 10 simple nuclear bombs, “depending on the efficiency of the enrichment process and the design of the nuclear weapon.”

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/arti...ar-deal-is-an-unforgivable-betrayal-of-israel
Flash forward to the Obama administration. Now the president is no longer trying to stop Iran from going nuclear. “Never” has been slimmed down to 13 years – at best! The Iranians have secured enough nuclear fuel to make the first generation bomb small enough to be dropped from a transport plane. The former International Atomic Energy Agency inspector, Olli Heinonen, reckons the proposed agreement from the Lausanne talks leaves Iran “a threshold breakout nuclear state for the next 10 years.” But we may have only the mirage of an agreement since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his associates are producing tons of ambiguity about what was agreed – and on our side, where unity is essential in dealing with a very slippy adversary, there are troubling discrepancies between the French and U.S. understandings.



You continue to repeat this lie over and over again . The Iran nuke deal forbids them from building nuclear weapons.


Noname.jpg
 
I give you information... over and over and you come back with that fact checker bullshit? That is proof of insanity right there.
Go do some real research... see what the experts are saying.
See the facts... combine that with the recent approval of uranimum going to Iran and Hillary selling it to the Russians and you have something only a crooked Pravda press would not be investigating.

This was the biggest sell out of world security in history.


a 10 year moratorium and then the ability to be a threshold breakout state in 10 years... is genocidal insanity.

giving them uranimum and the cash... is giving the the means and the legal cover to have the bomb in 10 years.

You said Obama gave Iran "the right to build nukes"


The deal gives them permission to make /use nuclear energy,It does not give them permission to build nuclear weapons,it expressly forbids it and part of the deal was Iran had to abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that it signed in 1974.

Is it possible Iran could violate the treaty they signed with the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, France, China and Germany and build nuclear weapons? Yes they can but that is not Obama or The Iran nuclear deal giving Iran the right to build nukes as you keep stating

There is a huge difference between a treaty giving a country permission to build nuclear weapons and a country violating the terms of a treaty to build nuclear weapons.
 
Every single one of those incidents got a weeks worth of news coverage in the msm. "You lie" was branded as a racial slur from Joe Walsh. And the only statement that is even comparable is when Ted Nugent said obama should suck on his machine gun or something along those lines, but Ted Nugent is a nobody who gets his name in the press by intentionally saying imflamattory things.

If i was to create a laundry list of every single thing some random on the left said that was beyond those levels, id be here all day.

@ 1:28

@:23

@:15
@1:13
 
Last edited:
To say that Colbert's comment was "nowhere" as vulgar as Trump's comments about Megan Kelly or the "pussy" tape is just bullshit, Piezoe. It was equally uncalled for and just as vile.

The lack of civility on both sides is shocking.
I can respect your view.
 
The comparisons are wrong for a simple reason. All of them have involved private individuals making comments. Name one person on network TV who ever made a remark like that about Obama. We all know very well what would have happened to any employee of a network, from CEO on down, who said anything remotely as insulting about Obama.

So this is a disaster for CBS on two grounds. One, it confirms beyond any doubt their open bias. Two, the network that purports to set the gold standard for news and journalism, now says it is acceptable to make this kind of comment about the President of the US. From now on, they are no better than the National Inquirer or TMZ. Maybe not as good.
 
I can respect your view.

Nice of you to say, but I'm not looking for you to respect my view. What would be nice is for you to put aside your partisanship for just a little while and be fair in your interpretations.

Saying Colbert's comment that the President of the United States uses his mouth as a cock holder for Putin is "nowhere as vulgar" as Trump saying "grab 'em by the pussy" shows a clear cut example of biased and partisan opinion.. If you would just equally condemn and be a bit more fair once in a while, you'd have a lot more credibility around here.
 
Nice of you to say, but I'm not looking for you to respect my view. What would be nice is for you to put aside your partisanship for just a little while and be fair in your interpretations.

Saying Colbert's comment that the President of the United States uses his mouth as a cock holder for Putin is "nowhere as vulgar" as Trump saying "grab 'em by the pussy" shows a clear cut example of biased and partisan opinion.. If you would just equally condemn and be a bit more fair once in a while, you'd have a lot more credibility around here.


While the 2 comments are on the same level in terms of vulgarity, you could also argue that Colbert's comment was much stupider. The writers and Colbert spent a day writing the show, and editing it, and the episode was even pre recorded and they still aired it, so not only is colbert an idiot, but every single person who works on his show who saw that script is an idiot.

In Trumps case while it was an equally obscene comment, i doubt there is many men out there who could honestly say if there worst comment to a friend was secretly recorded, that it wouldnt create issues in their life in this day and age.

Hell.... half the shit that got said in my hockey dressing room would probably pass as a hate crime now in canada. Im very happy that smart phones werent around back then, "faggot" was basically a term of endearment in our locker room, "Pass me the water bottle you faggot"

LOL, if the locker room talk in any 1 of the 500 games i played was recorded, my whole life would be ruined.

Thats why i really tend to say who gives a shit about this comment from colbert, because every single person who is chastising him has said something equally offensive at some point in their life. All of the people feigning outrage over Colbert's comments are disingenuous hypocrites, i just wish there was an equal standard.
 
Last edited:
Nice of you to say, but I'm not looking for you to respect my view. What would be nice is for you to put aside your partisanship for just a little while and be fair in your interpretations.

Saying Colbert's comment that the President of the United States uses his mouth as a cock holder for Putin is "nowhere as vulgar" as Trump saying "grab 'em by the pussy" shows a clear cut example of biased and partisan opinion.. If you would just equally condemn and be a bit more fair once in a while, you'd have a lot more credibility around here.

The difference here is one's a comedian and the other's running for the highest office in the land. I really don't understand this PC culture where people get offended over what comedians say. Happened when Daniel Tosh joked about rape, happened when Louis CK joked about pedophilia, happens all the time.
 
Back
Top