Cohen flipping

This guy is a professor and a legal analyst , read his tweets the site.


‘Collusion by any definition’: Legal expert uncovers ‘clear pattern’ of Trump ‘criminal’ conspiracy with Russia


Seth Abramson, a professor and legal analyst, on Thursday provided what he said was “evidence of criminal collusion” between President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and the Russian government.

In a massive Twitter thread, Abramson said that there was a “clear pattern” of actions taken by the Trump campaign before and after the election which points to a conspiracy to undermine U.S. sanctions against Russia.

Abramson came to the conclusion that there was “likely” collusion with Russia after examining the Trump campaign’s activities in four European countries — Italy, Greece, Hungary and Austria — which wanted sanctions to be lifted.

“As it’s illegal to accept anything of value from a foreign national as part of a campaign, negotiate U.S. policy if one hasn’t been elected, or aid/abet crimes committed against America by other nations, there was *no reason* for Trump to be in contact with these four nations,” Abramson wrote. “So if we detected a *clear pattern* of Trump aides not *only* secretly reaching out to foreign nations, but *exclusively reaching out to nations working to end sanctions on Russia*, and if we saw that pattern in *pre-election behavior*, it’d be evidence of criminal collusion.”

The legal analyst went on to break down the Trump campaign’s actions in each country.

“What is obvious is that *all* of Trump’s top aides—not just a few of them—targeted, and not just after the election but *during the election*, making as many covert contacts and having as many covert negotiations with Russia, Italy, Hungary, and Greece as they possibly could,” Abramson observed. “There’s *no* doubt that Trump was negotiating U.S. sanctions policy during the election and—I must add—both before, during, and *after* the revelation of Russian crimes against the United States. This is collusion (frankly even the meetings are collusion) by *any* definition.”

“Whether Trump also *coordinated* with Russian *hacking* is a separate question—and the jury is still out on that, though the Don Jr.-WikiLeaks secret messages are starting to tell that story,” he concluded. “But collusion on sanctions, and thus aiding and abetting Russian crimes? *Yes*.”

Read the entire Twitter thread below.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/07/co...ear-pattern-trump-criminal-conspiracy-russia/



When are all the scary pussies that you post about every hour for months on end going to actually indict Trump and do your great big scary thing?

Go ahead. Make my day.
 
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/michael-cohen-cooperation-federal-investigators/index.html

President Donald Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen has indicated to family and friends he is willing to cooperate with federal investigators to alleviate the pressure on himself and his family, according to a source familiar with the matter.

Cohen has expressed anger with the treatment he has gotten from the President, who has minimized his relationship with Cohen, and comments from the President's lawyer Rudy Giuliani, the source said. The treatment has left him feeling isolated and more open to cooperating, the source said.

DFsHUtAXgAA9vj4.jpg
Means nothing
 
let me interpret that for you... a professor says as it is illegal to commit crimes. If trumps people committed crimes... then crimes were committed. So its possible Trump's people committed crimes. We just can't name any. But we see a pattern which could have allowed them to no doubt be guilty of criminal collusion if their actions were criminal.


This guy is a professor and a legal analyst , read his tweets the site.


‘Collusion by any definition’: Legal expert uncovers ‘clear pattern’ of Trump ‘criminal’ conspiracy with Russia


Seth Abramson, a professor and legal analyst, on Thursday provided what he said was “evidence of criminal collusion” between President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and the Russian government.

In a massive Twitter thread, Abramson said that there was a “clear pattern” of actions taken by the Trump campaign before and after the election which points to a conspiracy to undermine U.S. sanctions against Russia.

Abramson came to the conclusion that there was “likely” collusion with Russia after examining the Trump campaign’s activities in four European countries — Italy, Greece, Hungary and Austria — which wanted sanctions to be lifted.

“As it’s illegal to accept anything of value from a foreign national as part of a campaign, negotiate U.S. policy if one hasn’t been elected, or aid/abet crimes committed against America by other nations, there was *no reason* for Trump to be in contact with these four nations,” Abramson wrote. “So if we detected a *clear pattern* of Trump aides not *only* secretly reaching out to foreign nations, but *exclusively reaching out to nations working to end sanctions on Russia*, and if we saw that pattern in *pre-election behavior*, it’d be evidence of criminal collusion.”

The legal analyst went on to break down the Trump campaign’s actions in each country.

“What is obvious is that *all* of Trump’s top aides—not just a few of them—targeted, and not just after the election but *during the election*, making as many covert contacts and having as many covert negotiations with Russia, Italy, Hungary, and Greece as they possibly could,” Abramson observed. “There’s *no* doubt that Trump was negotiating U.S. sanctions policy during the election and—I must add—both before, during, and *after* the revelation of Russian crimes against the United States. This is collusion (frankly even the meetings are collusion) by *any* definition.”

“Whether Trump also *coordinated* with Russian *hacking* is a separate question—and the jury is still out on that, though the Don Jr.-WikiLeaks secret messages are starting to tell that story,” he concluded. “But collusion on sanctions, and thus aiding and abetting Russian crimes? *Yes*.”

Read the entire Twitter thread below.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/07/co...ear-pattern-trump-criminal-conspiracy-russia/
 
Giuliani not worried about Cohen talking to investigators, 'as long as he tells the truth'
1529955630581.png

By Andrew O'Reilly | Fox News
1531061062421.jpg



Donald Trump walks with former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani (L) through the new Trump International Hotel in Washington, DC. (REUTERS/Mike Segar)

Rudy Giuliani made the rounds of the morning talk shows on Sunday to downplay concerns that President Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen will reveal any damning information during interviews with government investigators.

Giuliani, Trump’s current attorney, said on ABC’s “This Week” that neither he nor the president have any worries about what Michael Cohen will say “as long as he tells the truth.”

“I have no concern that Michael Cohen is going to do anything but tell the truth,” Giuliani said.

More on this...
Giuliani’s television appearances come on the heels of an admission earlier this week to ABC's George Stephanopoulos by Cohen -- who once boasted he would "take a bullet" for Trump -- that he is putting "family and country first" and protecting the president is not his priority.

While he wouldn't tell Stephanopoulos if he would cooperate with prosecutors, he also didn't dampen such speculation, taking issue with some of Trump's criticisms of the special counsel's Russia investigation and even going out of his way to praise the FBI.

He repeated previous denials that he had any involvement with Russian attempts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election, but he refused to criticize the investigation led by former FBI Director Robert Mueller.

Cohen’s home, office and a hotel room in New York were raided by the FBI in April as part of an investigation into his business dealings.

Among other things, investigators are looking into a $130,000 payment he handled as part of a confidentiality agreement with porn star Stormy Daniels, who says she had an affair with Trump in 2006. Trump denies the affair.

Cohen, 51, has scrubbed any mentions and photos from his Twitter profile that previously identified him as "Personal attorney to President Donald J. Trump” and, in what has been called a “warning shot,” hired Lanny Davis, a close friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton, to join his legal team.

Speaking on Sunday, Giuliani seemed unfazed by the recent developments – noting that Cohen "should cooperate with the government."

"We have no reason to believe he did anything wrong,” the former New York City mayor said of Cohen.


When questioned about a possible pardon for Cohen should he be charged and convicted, Giuliani said he has advised Trump that there should be "no discussion of pardons," adding that is "something you can decide down the road."

During an appearance on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” Giuliani added that he would not recommend that Trump sit down with special counsel Robert Mueller for an interview.

“We’re pretty much decided we are waiting for a decision of the counsel,” Giuliani said, adding that there needs to be “some basis for investigation.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.
 
Fitton: Judicial Watch Sues for Documents on Mueller’s Abusive Raid on Trump’s Lawyers
34smsu_trump-russia-probe-34689-michael-cohen-president-donald-trump-personal-640x427.jpg

AP Photo/Mary Altaffer
9 Jul 2018Washington D.C901
In April, Special Counsel Mueller and the DOJ crossed yet another bridge too far, when Mueller recommended, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein approved, a raid on President Trump’s then-personal attorney’s home and office.

At the time of the raid, I tweeted: “The raid is just one more reason to shut the Mueller operation down – it’s constitutionally suspect, ethically compromised, & frankly has no reason for being – given the fact that there’s no evidence of @RealDonaldTrump-Russia collusion.”

Judicial Watch began an investigation that has resulted in another JW “Mueller oversight project” lawsuit.

Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Justice Department for all records related to the April 9 raid on the office, home, and hotel room of Michael Cohen, then-personal attorney to President Donald Trump (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-01466)). The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the Justice Department lawlessly failed to respond to three separate FOIA requests.

On April 12, 2018, we sought from the Office of the Attorney General:

Any and all records of correspondence and communications between the Office of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and the Office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller concerning, regarding, or relating to the April 9, 2018 raids on the office and hotel room of Michael Cohen.”
Also on April 12, 2018, we sent a second FOIA request for the following from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys:

  • The Search and Seizure Warrant executed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation at the office and hotel room of Michael Cohen on April 9, 2018.
  • The application for the above-referenced warrant and any affidavits submitted in support of the application
  • All records about the recusal of U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman from the Michael Cohen investigation.
On May 2, 2018, we submitted a third FOIA request for the following from the Department of Justice:

  • All records of communications between Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York about Michael Cohen and/or the executed search warrants of Cohen’s office, home, and hotel room.
  • All records of communications between Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York about Michael Cohen and/or the executed search warrants of Cohen’s office, home, and hotel room.
On April 9, 2018, the FBI raided the home, office, and hotel room of President Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen. Prosecutors obtained the search warrant after receiving a referral from Special Counsel Mueller’s office conveyed through Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Lawyers for Michael Cohen reportedly completed a review of the over four million seized files from the raids and “found that 12,061 are privileged and shouldn’t be viewed by government lawyers.”

On its face, the raid on then-President Trump’s lawyer seemed abusive and out of line. It is not surprising that the Mueller Special Counsel and the Justice Department would ignore FOIA law and refuse to respond to Judicial Watch’s basic requests for information about this extraordinary raid.

Tom Fitton is president of Judicial Watch.
 
Back
Top