CNN Producer on tape admitting Witchhunt with no proof

exGOPer said:
Who cares what they were running with - they were running with all the Trump rallies while ignoring Dems during the primaries.
More...

There you go again with your binary thinking "one story." What I said was that "They do this 24/7, thus creating a fake news environment even if they were not the first. You seem to approach many scenarios with a binary mind that wants to find the one thing or person that is responsible and then no one else is. Washington and life in general do not work that way."

It is not an event or one story. It is an atmosphere of lefty histrionics and fake news 24/7.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
There you go again with your binary thinking "one story." What I said was that "They do this 24/7, thus creating a fake news environment even if they were not the first. You seem to approach many scenarios with a binary mind that wants to find the one thing or person that is responsible and then no one else is. Washington and life in general do not work that way."

It is not an event or one story. It is an atmosphere of lefty histrionics and fake news 24/7.
More...

Chasing a hot story doesn't make them fake news - if they were fake news, they won't have fired anyone over a story that would have been impossible to verify otherwise.

Save me the binary bullshit, you are lying when you say that they are fake news - fake news purveyors take zero responsibility for their actions - See Fox News who didn't take any actions against people who posted a hoax.
 
you made a stupid statement... your new arguments don't change that. giving examples of when unmasking is good does not render your stupid statement correct.

you really do manifiest problems understanding anything not binary.
so lets try this again...
unmasking traitors can sometimes be wrong... yes or no?



exGOPer said:
You think IC who has a whole procedure for unmasking don't know that?



Dan Coats - Trump's appointee says there was no violation at all, take up the issue with him



Complete fabrication. Dan Coats said that it was incidental collection because Russians were being spied on - how is it political spying if Flynn chooses to contact these Russians? Should Flynn be ignored because he is political now? That's not how this works, Flynn chose to contact Russians, nobody forced him to.
More...
 
jem said:
you made a stupid statement... your new arguments don't change that. giving examples of when unmasking is good does not render your stupid statement correct.

you really do manifiest problems understanding anything not binary.
so lets try this again...
unmasking traitors can sometimes be wrong... yes or no?
More...

Again - the IC did the unmasking and Dan Coats defended it by saying that there have been ZERO violations of the procedure, are you calling Dan Coats stupid?

There is NOTHING wrong with unmasking traitors, you are confused about unmasking vs leaking.
 
RedDuke said:
I just can not believe anyone out there still trust and pays attention to lying James O'Keefe. Insane
More...

Yes I know, he's a heretic, a rightwinger playing the leftwing game of shame Big Money. He just invents those videos and recorded admissions.
 
were talking about allowing a political operative like susan rice being allowed to illegally get the names of people in private conversations.

If there were never any violations of the law... why did they just send off the documents to the obama library instead of producing them for a foia reuqest.

your team is acting like a bunch of guilty crooks



http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...susan-rices-unmasking-material-obama-library/

exGOPer said:
Again - the IC did the unmasking and Dan Coats defended it by saying that there have been ZERO violations of the procedure, are you calling Dan Coats stupid?

There is NOTHING wrong with unmasking traitors, you are confused about unmasking vs leaking.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top