Was his plan from day 1. For anyone who bothered to pay attention, was obvious.
Bastard!
CNN Producer on tape admitting Witchhunt with no proof
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
Was his plan from day 1. For anyone who bothered to pay attention, was obvious.
Bastard!
I don't defend traitors at all. I hope all the traitors (if there are any) and all the leakers go to jail.
We have something called the constitution. You don't know my background but I promise you I made a career decision to not accept a very good job with a prosecutors office in larger part because I could not be part of walking all over the 4th amendment. If we don't defend the constitution and our privacy against the govt with all our might... we will eventually be just like Rollerball. (the original movie.)
We have something called the constitution. You don't know my background but I promise you I made a career decision to not accept a very good job with a prosecutors office in larger part because I could not be part of walking all over the 4th amendment. If we don't defend the constitution and our privacy against the govt with all our might... we will eventually be just like Rollerball. (the original movie.)
there very much can be something completely wrong with unmasking traitors.
I am not talking about specific s here because I don't know them all... but
you clearly not even close to comprehending the the real issues here because you are such a partisan dolt.
1. first of all if by unmasking a traitor you reveal legal trade craft, or tech capabilites... it could be very wrong.
2. if you violate the constitution collecting the evidence you are not going to be able to use it against the traitor in court... so find another way to deal with him.
3. finally, if your are illegally spying on people for political reasons and then you get you evidence... practically speaking and constitutionally speaking the ends don't justify the means.
If you already new the people you are spying on are traitors... then I grant you its more of a judgment call. But the intel should not be shared with the political opponents....ever.
I am not talking about specific s here because I don't know them all... but
you clearly not even close to comprehending the the real issues here because you are such a partisan dolt.
1. first of all if by unmasking a traitor you reveal legal trade craft, or tech capabilites... it could be very wrong.
2. if you violate the constitution collecting the evidence you are not going to be able to use it against the traitor in court... so find another way to deal with him.
3. finally, if your are illegally spying on people for political reasons and then you get you evidence... practically speaking and constitutionally speaking the ends don't justify the means.
If you already new the people you are spying on are traitors... then I grant you its more of a judgment call. But the intel should not be shared with the political opponents....ever.
You think IC who has a whole procedure for unmasking don't know that?
Dan Coats - Trump's appointee says there was no violation at all, take up the issue with him
Complete fabrication. Dan Coats said that it was incidental collection because Russians were being spied on - how is it political spying if Flynn chooses to contact these Russians? Should Flynn be ignored because he is political now? That's not how this works, Flynn chose to contact Russians, nobody forced him to.
Zero evidence that Rice was the leaker. You are conflating two different issues here.
And unless Trump and Co have stopped this incidental collection (which they have not), I don't even see your point of harping about Obama admin's so called unmasking when this is still going on and nobody cares. In fact Trump has given the deep state more powers than even Obama, CIA can assassinate anyone around the globe including American citizens without any oversight by the DOJ.
So what? Since then CNN has been running with it and spinning it harder and harder with fake news added on top. They do this 24/7, thus creating a fake news environment even if they were not the first. You seem to approach many scenarios with a binary mind that wants to find the one thing or person that is responsible and then no one else is. Washington and life in general do not work that way.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/29/opinions/much-ado-about-nothing-burger-van-jones/index.html
I just can not believe anyone out there still trust and pays attention to lying James O'Keefe. Insane
I just can not believe anyone out there still trust and pays attention to lying James O'Keefe. Insane
If flynn got caught up in incidental collection as part of a fisa warrant seach then that is not political but he then has to be masked unless the proper procedure for unmasking is followed. If it is just unmasked for the political purpose of outing him, then there legal issues there. That's why we need a full investigation.
Also, you have zero evidence of flynn being a traitor. He may have failed to disclose some actions, he may have failed to register as an agent for Turkey, and he may have lied to the fbi or not- we dont know. But those do not constitute treason.
You still seem to be totally unaware of the fact that it's the IC that does the unmasking with proper protocols set in place and Dan Coats during his testimony said under oath that there has been ZERO intentional violations
What do you call a person who takes money from a foreign country and changes foreign policy to then suit that country? Give me a better name and I would stop calling him a traitor.
Who cares what they were running with - they were running with all the Trump rallies while ignoring Dems during the primaries.
And if getting one story wrong makes them fake news, what would you call Fox News that posted and then deleted the Seth Rich story?