Quote from jonbig04:
Guess that's that.
dude there is life outside ET

I didn't expect you'd be interested. I still don't, so won't waste too much of my time or yours at this stage.
Keeping on topic to some extent...... Gov Sarah Palin would no doubt promote creationism equal to science in school given half the chance. She might do so on the broken back of a flimsy notion that it is scientific to surmise for no good reason that a supernatural being created everything.
There is compelling evidence against a supernatural being , for one thing , everything described as supernatural , by it's very nature, necessitates the description being of something which in the end must be natural .
For instance , if there really were a "creator", whatever it turned out to be, its being has to be natural.
If the suggestion is there can be something outside of nature which makes it supernatural, then any being described that way is by necessity, quite naturally like that.
Therefore it will inevitably be the embodiment of naturalness by default, as
everything is . Whatever circumstances has the thing that way , it is by that alone quite natural for it so to be. Were it not, the being would be more appropriately trivially described as unnatural , not supernatural.
There can be no significance for the supernatural other than the expression of an unknown. Nothing can be outside nature without it being that way naturally .
Hope that helps.
