CNBC: 125,000 Disney employees to receive $1,000 cash bonus due to tax reform

Who owns Sam's club?

I understand how business works which is why I mock people who try to attribute job gains to Trump for something that is natural business process.

Why the fallacious reasoning is what I ask, why is he responsible for only job gains but not losses. If one simply looks at trends, job growth is the slowest in six years - but he is not responsible for that? How convenient.

Some guys always anthropomorphize the world into heroes and villains. Trump keeps the birds in the sky and they imagine we thought of Obama the same way.
 
Who owns Sam's club?

I understand how business works which is why I mock people who try to attribute job gains to Trump for something that is natural business process.

Why the fallacious reasoning is what I ask, why is he responsible for only job gains but not losses. If one simply looks at trends, job growth is the slowest in six years - but he is not responsible for that? How convenient.

These guys are all muppets. When Trump was running the unemployment numbers were 90 million unemployed, now they go around talking about the lowest unemployment in history even though the number of people out of the work force has grown.

It’s impossible to have a real brass tax conversation with die hard Trump types. They think the economy runs on feelings and the skin color of the president.

Watch wages and household debt.
 
A friend's trading assistant used to work for Trumps besty Giuliani in the 90s when he was Mayor.

She is always saying be very wary. Giuliani fabricated positive figures from thin air. It worked, it raised the belief that NYC was developing rapidly but it was pure smoke and mirrors until it was true. I don't know if Trump has the ability to warp employment reports etc. via loyalists there but if he can, you know he will.
 
Who owns Sam's club?

I understand how business works which is why I mock people who try to attribute job gains to Trump for something that is natural business process.

Why the fallacious reasoning is what I ask, why is he responsible for only job gains but not losses. If one simply looks at trends, job growth is the slowest in six years - but he is not responsible for that? How convenient.

Every President including Obama, Clinton, Bush, etc. has taken credit for job claims and avoided being blamed for job losses. This is all politics. The reality is that the President has little to do with the business cycle.

However there should be recognition that changes in tax laws (driven by Congress normally) do have an impact on employment, employee compensations, business cycles, and stock valuation.
 
Every President including Obama, Clinton, Bush, etc. has taken credit for job claims and avoided being blamed for job losses. This is all politics. The reality is that the President has little to do with the business cycle.

However there should be recognition that changes in tax laws (driven by Congress normally) do have an impact on employment, employee compensations, business cycles, and stock valuation.

Every other President has not called the numbers fake and then called the same set of numbers using the SAME criteria as something he should be credited for. In fact, Buy1Sell2 and Cons like him are lying simplicity about how Trump changed Obama's job counting rules and the numbers are now true unlike those Mooslim numbers. This is just more dishonesty from your side.

As for the connection, since you yourself bought up the business CYCLE, isn't it kind of early in the cycle to attribute anything to any policy. Trump's policies are only starting to have an effect and unless they are seen in aggregate, these kind of anecdotal puff pieces are nothing but propaganda.
 
Every President including Obama, Clinton, Bush, etc. has taken credit for job claims and avoided being blamed for job losses. This is all politics. The reality is that the President has little to do with the business cycle.

However there should be recognition that changes in tax laws (driven by Congress normally) do have an impact on employment, employee compensations, business cycles, and stock valuation.
Right. The effect of the tax policy change is the subject of the thread. Tards have a hard time focusing on the subject.
 
Last edited:
Agreed, there won't be any bonuses if Trump lost, however there won't have been a 300 billion a year structural deficit either.

You could give EVERYONE a $1000 bonus and beyond with that amount of money, I mean we are talking 3 trillion over a decade - tell me how that is a good thing.

I thought you guys hated liberal art but loved math and economics but you can't even do mathematics now when in a cult?


You flip out about $3 trillion over a decade, but were dead silent about $10 trillion over the last 8 years.
 
Back
Top