Climate Change... its the sun... again.

So I guess then that you think that CO2 is not a GHG.

Low Quality Trolling
HPkap7B.jpg
 
This is literally like playing checkers with a 2 year old.

You want me to respond in one of two ways:
  1. The first way is "yes" CO2 is a GHG. In which you will probably reply something like; you righty moron CO2 is going up and is a GHG therefore there is global warming even a fucking 10 year old can get it.
  2. The other way you want me to respond is "no" CO2 is not a GHG. In which you will probably reply something like - You don't even know what a GHG is? That is science 101. Righty moron.
I even made an attempt to replicate your gibberish.


I really don't understand why you don't think CO2 is a GHG. Why? Maybe you don't know what a GHG is?
 
Number 2


Oh! Why didn't you tell me sooner! We were getting ahead of ourselves then...

GHG stands for GreenHouse Gas. This is how GHG's work...

A greenhouse gas (sometimes abbreviated GHG) is a gas in an atmosphere that absorbs and emitsradiation within the thermal infrared range. This process is the fundamental cause of the greenhouse effect.[1] The primary greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere are water vapor, carbon dioxide,methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone. Greenhouse gases greatly affect the temperature of the Earth; without them, Earth's surface would average about 33 °C colder, which is about 59 °F below the present average of 14 °C (57 °F).[2][3][4]
 
I really don't understand why you don't think CO2 is a GHG. Why? Maybe you don't know what a GHG is?

The American Physical Society stated:

Bold mine.

APS1_zps0863ed22.png

The last column of the table above [see Nature Geosciences 1, 735 (2008)] shows successive IPCC estimates of the Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity4, following first estimates more than a century ago. A factor-of-three uncertainty in the global surface temperature response to increased atmospheric CO2 as expressed by ECS has persisted through the last three decades of research despite the significant intellectual effort that has been devoted to climate science.

Then the American Physical Society reasonably asked:
What gives rise to the large uncertainties in this fundamental parameter of the climate system?
• How is the IPCC’s expression of increasing confidence in the detection/ attribution/ projection of anthropogenic influences consistent with this persistent uncertainty? Wouldn’t detection of an anthropogenic signal necessarily improve estimates of the response to anthropogenic perturbations?

Blahahahahahahahaha - "despite the significant intellectual effort"
 
Oh! Why didn't you tell me sooner! We were getting ahead of ourselves then...

GHG stands for GreenHouse Gas. This is how GHG's work...

A greenhouse gas (sometimes abbreviated GHG) is a gas in an atmosphere that absorbs and emitsradiation within the thermal infrared range. This process is the fundamental cause of the greenhouse effect.[1] The primary greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere are water vapor, carbon dioxide,methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone. Greenhouse gases greatly affect the temperature of the Earth; without them, Earth's surface would average about 33 °C colder, which is about 59 °F below the present average of 14 °C (57 °F).[2][3][4]
Like playing checkers with a two year old. Blahahahahaha

2. The other way you want me to respond is "no" CO2 is not a GHG. In which you will probably reply something like - You don't even know what a GHG is? That is science 101. Righty moron.
 
Look, either CO2 is GHG, or it's not. Apparently you think it is not. I won't even go into the fact that by some calculations CO2 is responsible for 80% of the earth's GHG effect.

Really, since you don't think that CO2 is a GHG, or even know what that is, you are really too stupid to waste time arguing with.
 
Back
Top