That garbage around 1:45pm est really pissed me off I was short but got anxious and manually exited. I guess I'll start taking longer lunch breaks. However I have a short strangle working it is working nicely so far (80put, 83call)
Quote from schizo:
![]()
The white candle afterwards confirmed the low was in. But the candle afterwards said otherwise.Quote from NoDoji:
The second blue BUY box (from the left) is tricky. When that bar was in progress it eclipsed the previous bar to the upside and probably sucked in a lot of longs. But if you waited for the entire bar to complete, it was a very indecisive bar with wicks on both ends and I would wait for further action to choose sides.
Quote from schizo:
![]()
anyways...Not sure if I would have taken that trade while I was watching those bars form in real time. Its a bit too choppy for me. We have some lower highs, but we also have a big up bar and a higher low. By the time I determined the move down was forreal I would have missed most of it. If I took a trade on that move my short entry would probably be on that 3rd red candle, figure somewhere around .30, I definitely would not have been in the trade up at .60 where your box is. The problem is that you would not have known as it was unfolding because all you would have seen was the long tail of the candle with the rising white body. Of course, at the end of the 5-minute, all that would be changed.Quote from NoDoji:
The second blue BUY box (from the left) is tricky. When that bar was in progress it eclipsed the previous bar to the upside and probably sucked in a lot of longs. But if you waited for the entire bar to complete, it was a very indecisive bar with wicks on both ends and I would wait for further action to choose sides.
Forget the right portion of the chart and look only at what has transpired thus far. You would see that the current candle, after making a new LOD, pierced right back above the previous low made at 2. To me that shows strength. Had we one more upthrust, I have no doubt this baby would have shot for the moon. But then again...Quote from F112358:
Hola.
Only 1 comment that is obvious to me: trade 5 doesn't look at all like trade 4 in reverse. In trade 4 several breaks of previous candle lows happened before trade 4 was entered (market showed weakness) and in trade 5 no strength was shown.
Just what I see that is obvious. I have to study that chart tomorrow, looks like a great approach!.

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I invite you to swing on by during the trading hours and get this ball rolling. Who knows? We could get the analysis going while the market is open. How's that for a change?Quote from spd:
Another day I was busy running around. I took no trades today, nor have I watched any prices other than cnbc updates on my blackberry...so this is all hindsight analysis coming from me. Just thought Id be upfront about that.

Globex closed +.41 since pit. This has the possibilty of making a new high 2morrow. Depends on the jobs report tommorowQuote from schizo:
Forget the right portion of the chart and look only at what has transpired thus far. You would see that the current candle, after making a new LOD, pierced right back above the previous low made at 2. To me that shows strength. Had we one more upthrust, I have no doubt this baby would have shot for the moon. But then again...![]()