Sorry. I didn't realize that you are capable of bashing Sanders more quickly than I can.
Well done. I don't know why these folks assume some sort of "lefty" affiliation whenever some one posts some sensible objection to Trump's unethical or illegal behavior. It makes no sense to do that, because people of a wide range of political persuasion will be voting against Trump in the Nov. Election. This will happen regardless of the opposition candidate. As a matter of inescapable fact, there are plenty of prominent Republicans that believe Trump is a dangerous demagogue behaving like a mob boss, and for the sake of our democratic republic and the rule of law should be removed from office. These folks may well vote for the Democrat candidate, some for the first time in their lives.Treefrog took that throne with his multi year Horowitz nonsense.My favorite...
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...rt-likely-issues-my-never-humble-view.321362/
Among other things that will be in the report- and I have stated this before- several times. One of the lefties here has repeatedly scoffed at it and dismissed it, so that is pretty much the confirmation I need.
The report will include among other things:
- Issues related to McCabes failure to recuse due to his wifes dnc funding. And failureof Comey or Rosenstein to oversee it.
- Issues related to McCabe and company deliberately slow-walking the emails discovered in weiners/humas laptop. ie, deliberately not reviewing them to let the election blow over first.
-Issues related to Comey’s absolutely drop-dead atrocious handling of the announcement of no action against Hillary. Comey was not even in the prosecutorial division of the DOJ and not even remotely in the chain of command if Loretta recused. It should have then defaulted to Sally Yates or Rosenstein or a couple others. The IG is going to have major heartburn over that. It is just nuts.
-There are enough hours in the day to even begin to outline the issues he will have with the FBI’s handling of witnesses that were in Camp Hillary. That will drive him nutso too. The FBI immediately moved to give them all immunity with absolutely nothing received in return. And then issue after issue on top of that. He must have just been shaking his head when he looked at all of that. I am going to guess that the IG does not think they are in the business of handing out HQ Specials.
- I would imagine that the IG will have issues with the DOJ/FBI being chronically unable to find emails and not maintaining back-up procedures -possibly deliberately. Remember when the FBI tried that little stunt again with Congress and said it did not have McCabe’s, Pages, Strzok etc emails? And then the IG said “not to worry” I have them even if you clowns don’t……and he did.
- And then there is the bonus issue that I throw in knowing that there is some chance that I am wrong and the tards will stick it up my bo-bo. Nevertheless, I stand by the idea that the IG will not take a pass on addressing that whole Tarmac Clown Show. It does not matter to me in the least that it is no longer an issue in the press or here on the forum. My assessment of Horowtiz’s professionalism is that he will not let it pass. The IG is not a criminal investigator so I am not saying he will reach any conclusions on whether collusion took place there. But as the chief guardian of departmental rules and procedures, I do think he will have a major issue with the fact that the FBI immediately looked the other way rather than investigating it and focused on threatening the person who took the photo rather than developing the facts. I could be wrong and if so I will hear about it. And if I am right I imagine I will hear less.
And then of course there will be other issues - hopefully many surprises. Rosenstein will take hits on issues I dont even know about. He is a target rich environment. And then Comey will take hits on things - many that I do know about- including leaking, failure to manage misconduct by his staff, the hillary announcement thing, and on and on.
Well done. I don't know why these folks assume some sort of "lefty" affiliation whenever some one posts some sensible objection to Trump's unethical or illegal behavior. It makes no sense to do that, because people of a wide range of political persuasion will be voting against Trump in the Nov. Election. This will happen regardless of the opposition candidate. As a matter of inescapable fact, there are plenty of prominent Republicans that believe Trump is a dangerous demagogue behaving like a mob boss, and for the sake of our democratic republic and the rule of law should be removed from office. These folks may well vote for the Democrat candidate, some for the first time in their lives.
The lawless Trump, who is simultaneously a dangerous, lawless demagogue and ridiculous, self-serving, charismatic TV Buffoon, will invigorate his supporters with a steady stream of fear mongering and innuendo charged rhetoric: open borders , late term abortion, radical socialist agenda, lock her up, invading caravans, raise taxes, pallets of cash to Iran, etc.
Trump hides behind a Nixon era DOJ opinion. In light of current developments, that long-ago opinion is appearing more and more absurd. It cannot be lost on Trump that if he loses the next election, he could go to to jail. He must be desperate to win in the Fall, and this will make him all the more dangerous, all the more willing to take chances. And all the more likely to bully and intimidate those around him to keep them silent.
Trump's simplified, repetitive cadences stir the basest instincts in his supporters, keeps them close to the fold and unifies them in their common fear of outsiders, those coming for their guns, and the radical socialist agenda of imagined sinister forces against them. That same rhetoric, however, equally unifies an opposition drawn from the entire political spectrum -- their unifying theme: a passionate belief that in a democracy the Sanctity of the Rule of Law must be held inviolate. And so Trump must go.
LOL....who the hell is "Bernard"??? I know there have been too many democrat candidates to keep track of but wtf? Help me narrow this down based on policies, is Bernard for or against AOC's Global Railway System?It is still a long way to the DNC convention. After California we will very likely know whether the nominee will be Bernard or someone else. If it is Bernard, then I would think voters under 35 and Russia will determine the outcome -- do they register and vote, or do they do they kiss it off. Those who, at this early stage, are confidently predicting an outcome of either the primary or the Nov. election are unwise in my opinion.
Be compassionate... Take pity on Piezoe the poor dumb bastard.LOL....who the hell is "Bernard"??? I know there have been too many democrat candidates to keep track of but wtf? Help me narrow this down based on policies, is Bernard for or against AOC's Global Railway System?
(update: Okay, you chose to call Bernie by his formal first name that only his mother called him by, at first glance I was like who the hell is "Bernard".) LOL
LOL....who the hell is "Bernard"??? I know there have been too many democrat candidates to keep track of but wtf? Help me narrow this down based on policies, is Bernard for or against AOC's Global Railway System?
(update: Okay, you chose to call Bernie by his formal first name that only his mother called him by, at first glance I was like who the hell is "Bernard".) LOL
Are we finally going to get a railroad bridge across the North Atlantic? Maybe Bernard will push it through during his Congressional "honeymoon" period. Alternatively, why not engage young Tesla to design an underwater tube large enough for luxury high speed rail and sink it from Halifax to Southampton. Oh hell, just go all the way. Hook it directly to the London Tube and the passengers can disembark in front of the Park Lane. Now what could be more convenient than that! That seems every bit as practical as building a retirement village on the moon, or whatever that other Tesla project was involving rockets..LOL....who the hell is "Bernard"??? I know there have been too many democrat candidates to keep track of but wtf? Help me narrow this down based on policies, is Bernard for or against AOC's Global Railway System?
(update: Okay, you chose to call Bernie by his formal first name that only his mother called him by, at first glance I was like who the hell is "Bernard".) LOL