China endures worst cold wave in 140 years

Quote from pspr:

Weather Channel founder debunks the myth of Anthropogenic Global Warming

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/_pYkhKobLN4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
More...

Weather Channel founder is an ignorant old denier ideologue and not a climate scientist. There is so much wrong with his presentation I don't know where to start.

But you can keep looking anywhere but the experts for your answers if you like. I expect nothing more from you.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Weather Channel founder is an ignorant old denier ideologue and not a climate scientist. There is so much wrong with his presentation I don't know where to start.

But you can keep looking anywhere but the experts for your answers if you like. I expect nothing more from you.
More...
And you are an ignorant old fool who ignores the facts.

But then, you are what you are. A closed minded AGW promoter. Don't let any new conflicting data enter your head, futurecunt. It might cause it to explode!
 
Quote from Ricter:
These rightist useful idiots take the lowest temperatures in isolated areas and use them as proof of global non-warming. It isn't cold in their backyard, so they go somewhere where it is cold.
More...
No Ricter, I'm just trying to debunk your global warming assertions. Real scientists are suppose to find evidence that debunks their theories. Leftist useful idiot scientist hate opposing evidence.

Also, it isn't "global warming" anymore. It is now "climate change". Get with the program.
 
Quote from Petsamo:

No Ricter, I'm just trying to debunk your global warming assertions. Real scientists are suppose to find evidence that debunks their theories. Leftist useful idiot scientist hate opposing evidence.

Also, it isn't "global warming" anymore. It is now "climate change". Get with the program.
More...
No, I'm just trying to debunk your global non-warming assertions.
 
Quote from pspr:

And you are an ignorant old fool who ignores the facts.

But then, you are what you are. A closed minded AGW promoter. Don't let any new conflicting data enter your head, futurecunt. It might cause it to explode!
More...

I would love to hear that AGW is not happening and there nothing to worry about. That's not happening right now. 97% of all the world's experts, the data, and common sense, which you are apparently devoid of, point the opposite way.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

I would love to hear that AGW is not happening and there nothing to worry about. That's not happening right now. 97% of all the world's experts, the data, and common sense, which you are apparently devoid of, point the opposite way.
More...

You're back to the 97% nonsense. No, it is not 97% percentage of the world's experts... it is just a sample of 79 self-proclaimed 'climatologists'. As a whole the data does not support AGW, only cherry-picked data samples by global alarmists support their fabricated arguments for AGW.

Common sense would dictate that the climate naturally changes in cycles like it has for thousands of years before the industrial age. AGW is a farce.

When the data stopped supporting their absurd assertions, Al Gore & the alarmists changed the name from "global warming" to "climate change". Within the next couple years the "global warming" farce is going to fizzle out - just like "global cooling" did in the 1970s.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

You're back to the 97% nonsense. No, it is not 97% percentage of the world's experts... it is just a sample of 79 self-proclaimed 'climatologists'. As a whole the data does not support AGW, only cherry-picked data samples by global alarmists support their fabricated arguments for AGW.

Common sense would dictate that the climate naturally changes in cycles like it has for thousands of years before the industrial age. AGW is a farce.

When the data stopped supporting their absurd assertions, Al Gore & the alarmists changed the name from "global warming" to "climate change". Within the next couple years the "global warming" farce is going to fizzle out - just like "global cooling" did in the 1970s.
More...

No really, it's 97% of the world's top climatologists, verified by multiple studies that used multiple methodologies. To continue to deny that means you are simply an ignorant idiot.

The reason it was changed to climate is due to politics and the fact that GW results in both warming and changes in climate other than simple warming, like droughts, cold waves and other atypical weather phenomena.

Common sense is assuming that a 40% increase in the most important long term greenhouse gas will cause an increase in heat content of the earth. The only people that have a problem understanding this are either idiots, ideologically constrained idiots or ignorant of the facts. Which of those are you?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

No really, it's 97% of the world's top climatologists
More...

<font size=6 color=red><b>FALSE!!!!</font></b>

Try again dumbass. You are so full of shit that it's coming out of your ears.

Common sense tells you that a TRACE gas has ZERO effect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top