China endures worst cold wave in 140 years

[futurecurrents]

Quote from pspr:

<font size=6 color=red><b>FALSE!!!!</font></b>

Try again dumbass. You are so full of shit that it's coming out of your ears.

Common sense tells you that a TRACE gas has ZERO effect.

Oh you must be right because you made it bold and red and called me names.


OK, how about this one. Every science organization the world agrees with the basic truth and science of AGW. Every one of them. Even the society of petroleum engineers.

You are an imbecile and a joke.

 

[jem]

link to a study in which 97 percent of any secientists agreed about anything.

that is such horseshit.

everytime you have been asked to present a link to that study you have either failed or pointed to a link...

in which half the scientists did not respond and in the ones that did they cherry picked the group to be those published in pro global warming publications...

but even in that group... the scientists did not state that man made co2 was causing agw...


so you completely full of crap on just about every level.

Quote from futurecurrents:

No really, it's 97% of the world's top climatologists, verified by multiple studies that used multiple methodologies. To continue to deny that means you are simply an ignorant idiot.

The reason it was changed to climate is due to politics and the fact that GW results in both warming and changes in climate other than simple warming, like droughts, cold waves and other atypical weather phenomena.

Common sense is assuming that a 40% increase in the most important long term greenhouse gas will cause an increase in heat content of the earth. The only people that have a problem understanding this are either idiots, ideologically constrained idiots or ignorant of the facts. Which of those are you?

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from futurecurrents:

No really, it's 97% of the world's top climatologists, verified by multiple studies that used multiple methodologies. To continue to deny that means you are simply an ignorant idiot.

That's 97% of 79 climatologists in ONE study.

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from futurecurrents:


Common sense is assuming that a 40% increase in the most important long term greenhouse gas will cause an increase in heat content of the earth...

So after the 40% increase CO2 represents a mere 0.0387% of the earth's atmosphere.

Al Gore says this is a crisis.... let's spend lots of tax money on this non-existent problem so he can get rich via his hedge fund.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from gwb-trading:

So after the 40% increase CO2 represents a mere 0.0387% of the earth's atmosphere.

Al Gore says this is a crisis.... let's spend lots of tax money on this non-existent problem so he can get rich via his hedge fund.

BINGO!


Al Whore want to be able to afford higher class hookers than the one he got caught with.

 

[pspr]

Quote from futurecurrents:

Oh you must be right because you made it bold and red and called me names.


OK, how about this one. Every science organization the world agrees with the basic truth and science of AGW. Every one of them. Even the society of petroleum engineers.

You are an imbecile and a joke.

Like you don't call me names. LOL

How about this one. YOU ARE WRONG.

You'll probably figure it out in just a few more years. That's when you'll be so embarrassed your alias will just disappear from ET.

We'll never know who the fool, futurecunt, really is.

 

[futurecurrents]

Every science organization in the world.



Multiple studies (no fewer than five) using various methods....97%.

The Weather Channel statement:

These observations, together with computer model simulations and historical climate reconstructions from ice cores, ocean sediments and tree rings all provide strong evidence that the majority of the warming over the past century is a result of human activities. <Bold>This is also the conclusion drawn, nearly unanimously, by climate scientists<Bold>



Those are the facts.

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from futurecurrents:
Every science organization in the world.

List them. There are plenty of leading science organizations cited in previous threads that did not.

Quote from futurecurrents:
Multiple studies (no fewer than five) using various methods....97%.

Provide the studies with a link to each study.

There is only one study consisting of under 80 'climatologists' that provides the 97% figure.

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from gwb-trading:

List them. There are plenty of leading science organizations cited in previous threads that did not.


Provide the studies with a link to each study.

There is only one study consisting of under 80 'climatologists' that provides the 97% figure.

No. It doesn't matter. You won't believe anyhow or have some lame reason not to believe it. Look it up.https://www.google.com/search?q=sci...j69i60j69i62.13159j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 I've posted them in the past.

You are wrong about only one study.

There is no major science organization in the world that denies the basic science and truth of global warming. So you are wrong about that also.

 

[pspr]

<a href=http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/05/26/to-the-horror-of-global-warming-alarmists-global-cooling-is-here/><b>To The Horror Of Global Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling Is Here</b></a>

"...we are now on an ‘unavoidable advance towards a deep temperature drop."