Quote from frenchfry:
Would be interesting to hear your reasoning for those trades.
It looks like some of them would be wash trades because they violated the green book marks. How did you know that you can still stay in those trades and not reverse when the bookmarks were violated?
Do a small refinement.
this refinement applied to both BM's and lat's.
Whether to decide or not depends on one criteria or filter.
The close must be used.
The close must be more extreme than the relative reference.
This system is mathematically perfect.
You have three operators: <, =, >
Since we are in a BINARY system dictated by the market's operation, the = has to be linked to one of the other operators..
So do this.
In reasoning we are using Keynes PARAdigm theory and Carnap's logic Theory and an algebra by George Boole.
As you see we are in a modus of human psychology. Human psychology is invariant.
Because all variables have granularity, the system is dictated to be finite maths.
All of this means we differentiate to have a set of unique names (elements).
You ask about the way the routine of evaluation is done. It is made rigorous and totally inflexible.
All said in this post is not possible to understand by some humans for human psychology reasons.
I examine each participating reason and put next to his name his reasons for not understanding. I train him to not acquire the Holy Grail in a way that fits with the consequences of his prior decisions to acquire beliefs.
I cannot have an unsuitable person working to help vetrans with the gift of PTSD. Only well people can help damaged people.
The markets represent invariant human psychology.
More extreme means not equal AND NOT less extreme.
This is a market neutral statement.
Now you have cleaned up some details that you did not deduce.
thanks for the chart and its annotations.