I am afraid that you are confused. There is one political party in the US that is attempting censor and even completely silence the speech of anyone that disagrees with anything that they believe by any means necessary including destroying people's lives and livelihood. Citizens didn't boycott parlor. Citizens didn't deplatform Trump.
Cancel culture has gone too far
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
No, I'm on topic ... the boycott.
If you want to present a new premise, cite your sources, or else it'll simply be your unsubstantiated accusations, against my unsubstantiated denials. Up to you.
Kiss my ass with your "source" bullshit. I am not a sheeple that needs sources.
Sources are not needed to have discussions, debates, and/or opinions.
If someone thinks that sources are necessary to discuss what is blatantly obvious, that person is a screaming dumb ass that is not capable of any logical reasoning.
Your pussy is way to dry for you to be riding me like this.
I am sick of the left on this board demanding some stupid source for everything. It is dumb.
Again, sources are not needed to have discussions, debates, and/or opinions.
I am fully capable of forming my own opinions. I don't need nor do I want to be told what to think.
If you recall, I didn't demand. I said it was up to you.
Then you blew a gasket like a bitch and started riding me with that dry ass pussy you got.
How Cons here want to debate:
Con: "The left is eating kids."
Lib: "Evidence?"
Con: "Evidence is stupid!"
HOW TO DEBATE
https://www.sfu.ca/cmns/130d1/HOWTODEBATE.htm
"... You must justify your arguments with basic logic, worked examples, statistics, and quotes. Debating is all about the strategy of “proof”. Proof, or evidence, supporting your assertion is what makes it an argument. ..."
Con: "The left is eating kids."
Lib: "Evidence?"
Con: "Evidence is stupid!"
HOW TO DEBATE
https://www.sfu.ca/cmns/130d1/HOWTODEBATE.htm
"... You must justify your arguments with basic logic, worked examples, statistics, and quotes. Debating is all about the strategy of “proof”. Proof, or evidence, supporting your assertion is what makes it an argument. ..."
Sources are needed for meaningful debate. Do you actually know how what you just said sounds to a room full of adults?
Do you even understand the whole purpose of debate?
When you evidence your assertions, it has nothing to do with whether you know how to form your own opinions, it's to add validity and weight to your opinions, in order to show the other side that you are correct, and know wtf you are talking about, and maybe even change a few minds.
That's why you post here, so others can read your posts, and be swayed. You'll only sway fellow dumb fucks if you can't even minimally support your position. And they don't need swaying, because they likely already agree with your position.
The only thing more racist than Dr. Suess's writings, is a white guy rapping to Dr. Suess's racist writings to the backdrop of a black rapper's music, because if you did that it would be more racist. So there is so much racism twisted up in Dr. Suess, his family estate should pay reparations to all black people, everywhere. Oh yeah, the guy performing in the video? Life imprisonment for offending all black people everywhere, and for implying Dr. Dre actually liked Dr. Suess's racist writings.
FUCKING MORONS!
