Some of you will know I have said this is the central question related to Oval Office protections for the person who holds the office and is one that the Supreme Court will have to weigh in on due to Trumps criminal nature.
Even though this is a “test” question what it actually asks is where is the line in the degree of crime which the constitution insulates the president from prosecution?
Can a sitting president actually shoot and kill his political opponent and there be no legal remedy as long as they are president? And if the answer is no, which it is, then the president is in fact not totally insulated from legal prosecution of criminal behavior. And, if not totally immune then where is the line drawn?
This question needs a ruling because of Trump who will push all issues of crime and legality way past what is accepted as the norm.
View attachment 211855
