Do you know how to read a chart? Ever hear about a thing called higher lows dumbshit? How about trends and moving averages? No? I didn't think so.
Typical dumb-ass righty.
Can global warming be real if itâs cold in the U.S.? Um⦠yes!
- Thread starter futurecurrents
- Start date
Do you know how to read a chart? Ever hear about a thing called higher lows dumbshit? How about trends and moving averages? No? I didn't think so.
Typical dumb-ass righty.
So in other words, you are totally incapable of addressing the data presented in the chart.
It appears all you can do is...
The part that's so wacky is no one here likes fc, and his four loon buddies, yet they post here vs going to some lefty nutcase board...
You gotta wonder why some people can't use authoritative sources.
Like NOAA isn't the best source of information about sea levels.
I guess it's hard to lie when using actual facts.
Like NOAA isn't the best source of information about sea levels.
I guess it's hard to lie when using actual facts.
We love pointing out just how stupid you are.
Hey. Did you ever admit that you lied when you said Schumer had a gun? Or that you were stupid enough to accept as proof something that some anonymous poster posted?
You righties are so stupid and gullible.
But the Koch bros love sheep like you and gwb. You do the lying for them!
You gotta wonder why some people are incapable of reading and understanding charts created using raw data from ARGO and NOAA.
"Strategies should promote fundamental shifts toward energy-efficient technologies and practices across the economy, and the more prominent use of fuels with lower carbon intensity"
http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/current-issues/climate-policy/climate-policy-principles/overview
http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/current-issues/climate-policy/climate-policy-principles/overview
Finally you post something where I can agree with a portion of it.
The U.S. should promote a the utilization of energy-efficient technologies and practices across the economy. The "winners" in the technology race however should be selected by the free market.
However AGW has does not drive the need to do this. The need is more driven by geo-politics and the need not to be dependent on foreign energy sources.
"More than a century's worth of detailed climate observations shows a sharp increase in both carbon dioxide and temperature. These observations, together with computer model simulations and historical climate reconstructions from ice cores, ocean sediments and tree rings all provide strong evidence that the majority of the warming over the past century is a result of human activities. This is also the conclusion drawn, nearly unanimously, by climate scientists."
http://www.weather.com/encyclopedia/global/index.html?from=search_siteresults<1>
http://www.weather.com/encyclopedia/global/index.html?from=search_siteresults<1>
Satellite sea level data has been "adjusted" upward by 34% over past 9 years alone
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2013/10/satellite-sea-level-data-has-been.html
