Can global warming be real if itâs cold in the U.S.? Um⦠yes!
- Thread starter futurecurrents
- Start date
Have you seen the guy's posts? He's not operating with a full deck.
I've not read his posts other than this one, which is sickening. He is more proof, however, that liberals really are the most dangerous thing America's EVER seen...
It's freezing cold and snowing like crazy because of global warming.
Yeah, we had another hard freeze here in FLORIDA last night... I guess if Hell froze over, the loon gw fruits might flush their sick idea, but I wouldn't think libtards believe in Hell (until they arrive there for eternity!)
===============Good points LEAPup
Well its not easy being a polar bear, concerning Florida; not only was global warming/algore exsposed as a scam. But NRA [right again,LOL] proved polulation of polar bears are stable to increasing.
Cool What a shame ,that emotional ad with bear cub cry was such a touchy feely whine.....Algore should be sued for fraud the founder of the weather channel said.
the world may be warming since the last ice age.. but there is no science saying man made c02 is doing it.
co2 trails warming.
http://www.climatechangedispatch.co...ture-rises.html
In a study recently published in Global and Planetary Change, Humlum et al. (2013) introduce their analysis of the phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and mean global air temperature by noting that over the last 420 thousand years, "variations in atmospheric CO2 broadly followed temperature according to ice cores, with a typical delay of several centuries to more than a millennium," citing Lorius et al. (1990), Mudelsee (2001) and Caillon et al. (2003).
And they explain this relationship by stating it "is thought to be caused by the slow vertical mixing that occurs in the oceans, in association with the decrease in the solubility of CO2 in ocean water, as its temperature slowly increases at the end of glacial periods (Martin et al., 2005), leading to subsequent net out-gassing of CO2 from the oceans (Togweiler, 1999)."
So if this be true for glacial cycles, should it not also be true for seasonal cycles?
Feeling that such might indeed be the case, the three Norwegian researchers intensively studied the phase relations (leads/lags) between atmospheric CO2 concentration data and several global temperature data series - including HadCRUT, GISS and NCDC surface air data, as well as UAH lower troposphere data and HadSST2 sea surface data - for the period January 1980 to December 2011. And what did they find?
Humlum et al. report that annual cycles were present in all of the several data sets they studied and that there was "a high degree of co-variation between all data series ... but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature." More specifically, they state that "the maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11-12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5-10 months [in relation] to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months [in relation] to global lower troposphere temperature," so that "the overall global temperature change sequence of events appears to be from the ocean surface to the land surface to the lower troposphere."
co2 trails warming.
http://www.climatechangedispatch.co...ture-rises.html
In a study recently published in Global and Planetary Change, Humlum et al. (2013) introduce their analysis of the phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and mean global air temperature by noting that over the last 420 thousand years, "variations in atmospheric CO2 broadly followed temperature according to ice cores, with a typical delay of several centuries to more than a millennium," citing Lorius et al. (1990), Mudelsee (2001) and Caillon et al. (2003).
And they explain this relationship by stating it "is thought to be caused by the slow vertical mixing that occurs in the oceans, in association with the decrease in the solubility of CO2 in ocean water, as its temperature slowly increases at the end of glacial periods (Martin et al., 2005), leading to subsequent net out-gassing of CO2 from the oceans (Togweiler, 1999)."
So if this be true for glacial cycles, should it not also be true for seasonal cycles?
Feeling that such might indeed be the case, the three Norwegian researchers intensively studied the phase relations (leads/lags) between atmospheric CO2 concentration data and several global temperature data series - including HadCRUT, GISS and NCDC surface air data, as well as UAH lower troposphere data and HadSST2 sea surface data - for the period January 1980 to December 2011. And what did they find?
Humlum et al. report that annual cycles were present in all of the several data sets they studied and that there was "a high degree of co-variation between all data series ... but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature." More specifically, they state that "the maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11-12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5-10 months [in relation] to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months [in relation] to global lower troposphere temperature," so that "the overall global temperature change sequence of events appears to be from the ocean surface to the land surface to the lower troposphere."
That can also be said about LEAPup .
Oh you don't NEED to explain anything, as no one is listening anyway.
You just WANT to keep "explaining", Ad nauseam.
===============Good points LEAPup
Well its not easy being a polar bear, concerning Florida; not only was global warming/algore exsposed as a scam. But NRA [right again,LOL] proved polulation of polar bears are stable to increasing.
Algore should be sued for fraud the founder of the weather channel said.
Yes, he had no training in climate science and was a right wing nut job like you. So of course he said that.
Gee, I wonder what the Weather Channel's statement on global warming is now?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I wonder if you denier nitwits even care.