Can global warming be real if itâs cold in the U.S.? Um⦠yes!
- Thread starter futurecurrents
- Start date
I like how all these retards comment on global warming, claiming they know something about it because they read an internet article. What a bunch of ignorant right wing morons....please just stop with your faggotry.
[QUOTE;Murray t turtle+ =futurecurrents;3931668]Yes, he had no training in climate science and was a right wing nut job like you. So of course he said that.
Gee, I wonder what the Weather Channel's statement on global warming is now?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I wonder if you denier ...wits even care.[/QUOTE]
==============
FutureCurrents; I have a REALTOR friend who strangely believes in ''global warming''LOL!! I told him i do NOT ,but I am planting trees,[cool] gave him some trees .....
Well since i like you, that a bias, so i may understate the global hot air scam; you may underestimate the importance of weather channel since you have a bias against weather channel[my source of much weather.
]
Also with all due respect ,buddy, most experienced chart readers would NOT call your 120year +/ chart a good uptrend for global warming. Not to mention ,,what would you think of a money manager who gets a 1% or 2% increase in 120/+ years LOL.Call him fired.
However thanks for the hockey stick trend chart; another chart principal, when most of the ''uptrend ''on a 120 year chart happens in lastyears, that means on your chart[even IF your data is correct??] Its not really a good hot uptrend, more like what we call ''noise''
I still like you, i simply do not agree with your ''trend '' chart analysis; even if your data [chart] is correct,, your trend analysis on that chart is incorrect.DONT take that personal;I am still learning myself.
God bless you , dont forget to plant trees[co2 eaters,LOL],LOL
Gee, I wonder what the Weather Channel's statement on global warming is now?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I wonder if you denier ...wits even care.[/QUOTE]
==============
FutureCurrents; I have a REALTOR friend who strangely believes in ''global warming''LOL!! I told him i do NOT ,but I am planting trees,[cool] gave him some trees .....
Well since i like you, that a bias, so i may understate the global hot air scam; you may underestimate the importance of weather channel since you have a bias against weather channel[my source of much weather.
]Also with all due respect ,buddy, most experienced chart readers would NOT call your 120year +/ chart a good uptrend for global warming. Not to mention ,,what would you think of a money manager who gets a 1% or 2% increase in 120/+ years LOL.Call him fired.
However thanks for the hockey stick trend chart; another chart principal, when most of the ''uptrend ''on a 120 year chart happens in lastyears, that means on your chart[even IF your data is correct??] Its not really a good hot uptrend, more like what we call ''noise''
I still like you, i simply do not agree with your ''trend '' chart analysis; even if your data [chart] is correct,, your trend analysis on that chart is incorrect.DONT take that personal;I am still learning myself.
God bless you , dont forget to plant trees[co2 eaters,LOL],LOL
this is what is wrong with america. its the left that makes up shit about co2 being the cause of global warming and then blames the right for asking for the science.
what tactic number is that in the alinsky playbook?
most of us here understand there is no proof we have warmed outside natural variability and there is no science saying adding man made co2 to our atmosphere produces more warming.
we are simply asking for those making claims to show us the science to backing them up.
for all we know adding co2 may create cooling. which would not be good either.
we just want science from those making claims and asking for wealth transfers.
what tactic number is that in the alinsky playbook?
most of us here understand there is no proof we have warmed outside natural variability and there is no science saying adding man made co2 to our atmosphere produces more warming.
we are simply asking for those making claims to show us the science to backing them up.
for all we know adding co2 may create cooling. which would not be good either.
we just want science from those making claims and asking for wealth transfers.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
Mlynczak is the associate principal investigator for the SABER instrument onboard NASA’s TIMED satellite. SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances that play a key role in the energy balance of air hundreds of km above our planet’s surface.
“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’
heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”
That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.
“The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...-have-caused-an-ice-age-claim-scientists.html
Ice age atmosphere was 'warm', claim scientists
A warm atmosphere rich in carbon dioxide may have surrounded the Earth in an ancient ice age, new research has suggested.
By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent 6:51PM GMT 01 Jan 2009Comments78 Comments
Researchers at the University of Birmingham found that 630 million years ago the earth had a warm atmosphere full of carbon dioxide but was completely covered with ice.
The scientists studied limestone rocks and found evidence that large amounts of greenhouse gas coincided with a prolonged period of freezing temperatures.
Such glaciation could happen again if global warming is not curbed, the university's school of geography, earth and environmental sciences warned.
While pollution in the air is thought to trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere, causing the planet to heat up, this new research suggests it could also have the opposite effect reflecting rays back into space.
This effect would be magnified by other forms of pollution in the earth's atmosphere such as particles of sulphate pumped into the air through industrial pollution or volcanic activity and could create ice age conditions once more, the scientists said.
Mlynczak is the associate principal investigator for the SABER instrument onboard NASA’s TIMED satellite. SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances that play a key role in the energy balance of air hundreds of km above our planet’s surface.
“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” explains James Russell of Hampton University, SABER’s principal investigator. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’
heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”That’s what happened on March 8th when a coronal mass ejection (CME) propelled in our direction by an X5-class solar flare hit Earth’s magnetic field. (On the “Richter Scale of Solar Flares,” X-class flares are the most powerful kind.) Energetic particles rained down on the upper atmosphere, depositing their energy where they hit. The action produced spectacular auroras around the poles and significant1 upper atmospheric heating all around the globe.
“The thermosphere lit up like a Christmas tree,” says Russell. “It began to glow intensely at infrared wavelengths as the thermostat effect kicked in.”
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...-have-caused-an-ice-age-claim-scientists.html
Ice age atmosphere was 'warm', claim scientists
A warm atmosphere rich in carbon dioxide may have surrounded the Earth in an ancient ice age, new research has suggested.
By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent 6:51PM GMT 01 Jan 2009Comments78 Comments
Researchers at the University of Birmingham found that 630 million years ago the earth had a warm atmosphere full of carbon dioxide but was completely covered with ice.
The scientists studied limestone rocks and found evidence that large amounts of greenhouse gas coincided with a prolonged period of freezing temperatures.
Such glaciation could happen again if global warming is not curbed, the university's school of geography, earth and environmental sciences warned.
While pollution in the air is thought to trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere, causing the planet to heat up, this new research suggests it could also have the opposite effect reflecting rays back into space.
This effect would be magnified by other forms of pollution in the earth's atmosphere such as particles of sulphate pumped into the air through industrial pollution or volcanic activity and could create ice age conditions once more, the scientists said.
North County San Diego is mostly filled with fiscally conservative people who don't want to see money wasted on wealth transfers and cap and trade. We all want lower taxes and an economy driven by private business...
So I suggest you make sure you stick to downtown and maybe the area around bankers hill.
So I suggest you make sure you stick to downtown and maybe the area around bankers hill.
[Most of QUOTE=jem;3932307]North County San Diego is mostly filled with fiscally conservative people who don't want to see money wasted on wealth transfers and cap and trade. We all want lower taxes and an economy driven by private business...
[/QUOTE]
====================
Good points;
plenty of people of every kind do not want a cap+ trade[tax increase]....
Plent of people do transfer thier wealth[Bill Gates,Dr Pat Robertson....];NOT thru the gov, not thru ''national socialists''
They do it thru private sector, giving, foundations, tithes love offerings....................................................
[/QUOTE]
====================
Good points;
plenty of people of every kind do not want a cap+ trade[tax increase]....
Plent of people do transfer thier wealth[Bill Gates,Dr Pat Robertson....];NOT thru the gov, not thru ''national socialists''
They do it thru private sector, giving, foundations, tithes love offerings....................................................
Wow, you are one fucked-up lying scumbag. Your deceit as is that of many of the deniers is despicable. The future of the world is stake. Not your fucked-up ideological stance.
I have debunked everything you wrote above multiple times and still you persist with your lies.
I can't even call you wrong because really , essentially, you are just lying. You really don't believe what you argue. If you do, you are much much stupider than I thought you were.