rosy2: well, that is exactly my point. you can't "precisely" define a double top. Your eyes see it as being attractive or not. If you get technical, of course you can look at how steep the valley in between is, how sharp or not the peaks are, how long, and so on... but just like with human beings, you just like a person, you don't say: i like him because and then you go enumerating an entire list of features.
you're all probably right, a good program might recognize maybe 80% of double tops or bottoms. maybe i like being a trader rather than a programmer and don't see the fun in this automated trading thing.
i have to confess i am biased when it comes to automated trading because most has been based until now on formulas (indicators) and being a daytrader i only lost money until i started to use only price patterns. one explanation is that an indicator will always have a value for you whether the market message is clear or confusing and for me that is a no go.
you're all probably right, a good program might recognize maybe 80% of double tops or bottoms. maybe i like being a trader rather than a programmer and don't see the fun in this automated trading thing.
i have to confess i am biased when it comes to automated trading because most has been based until now on formulas (indicators) and being a daytrader i only lost money until i started to use only price patterns. one explanation is that an indicator will always have a value for you whether the market message is clear or confusing and for me that is a no go.