Don't forget "Juneteenth" on the 19th of JuneThere are no secrets. Calendar never spreads, it is always 365 days.



What would cause this besides impending news or earnings?Calendars are short gamma and long ve. So you want vols to rise absent movement
What would cause this besides impending news or earnings?
You have no secrets. There is a 99.3% chance it is no secret at all, and/or it doesn't work as wonderful as you're anticipating it to,
All traders are ultimately just basic gamblers who arrogantly think they have been touched by God, and are superior to their fellow man in predicting the future and making boat loads of money from the market,
Out of the huge sample size, however, Someone has to be the real deal Holyfield that can deliver a knockout blow to the market,
The Holy Grail exists, but can only be touched and realized by the hands and minds of a Saint trader,
finally piercing above the clouds' a breath of fresh air. with a little humility you too can capture this feeling of virtually absolute certainty in every trade i take. my daily goal is 1000%
i know i know' you dont believe it and thats right where i want you, on the opposite side' improving my gains. to those who know im sorry i cant help myself i will stop giving it away'' just fishing for talent
Calendars are short gamma and long ve. So you want vols to rise....
This is a naive and simplistic view. The reality is that cals are a little more complex than that. An increase in general market IV normally results in the short IV increasing much more than the long IV.
What we want in the cals is not vols to rise, but
1) long vol to rise more than the short vol
2) or short vol to fall more than the long vol
We are trading the IV differential between the two.
It’s so complicated that des’s “naive and simplistic view” is correct.
Present a logical counter argument, and I may take your response seriously.
in your example the vol surface has moved in root time flat (no twist). No net pnl in a 1:1 calendar as the front has less vega than the back.
Des is right, because in this event of a root time move, if the realized vol is the same, you "get back" the loss on the front, but keep the gain on the back.