Bush's Plan to conquer...errrr.....liberate Iraq

Quote from KymarFye:

....Though I reject the ethnic and homophobic attacks on wild, I do wonder about his motivations, conscious or otherwise....
All in all, his "signature" comes across to me as deeply hypocritical. I think it would be more honest if he signed his posts "fuck you."

regards, especially to wild,

KymarFye
More...
KF, the reason I want to know Wild's ethnic background and where he was born and raised is NOT to ridicule or attack him on those points, but because by knowing those answers we can be in a better position to judge, as you say, "his motivations."

This is not to say that I will not disagree with him regardless of those motivations, but it would go a long way to trying to at least understand the reasoning behind his posts (pastes).

A case in point is Fairplay. He and I have been sparring on the Poll about attacking Iraq thread. Once I knew he was from Indonesia it made for, I think, a better (not necessarily all warm and fuzzy) dialogue. At least he and I are exchanging pleasantries to some degree now. Even though I disagree with Fairplay about a LOT of things, I respect him for being honest enough to tell us where he's from.

Wild's unwillingness to be honest and come clean but to also respond merely with other peoples' words and not exchange in any form of dialogue should make it obvious that he could care less about others' opinions. Furthermore, and it's kind of sad, he obviously can't think for himself either.

Save yourself a lot of time and just put him on Ignore. I check his posts only to see if he has anything original to say (he never does). If I see a pasted link, which is ALL the time, click - I just close the window. (Wild, since I know you'll read this, please know I don't even bother to look at the links you post anymore.)
 
Quote from KymarFye:



Well, just to continue this completely unproductive discussion a bit further, I find myself wondering whether he's more weird than malicious. If it's more the former, then he may merely seem condescending, when he's actually just kind of nuts, and not necessarily very intelligent. Or maybe he just lacks self-confidence, either in his English or in himself. Or maybe he really can't express himself. Maybe he doesn't even really understand much of this discussion or much of what he posts - or as much as he either thinks he does or would like us to think he does.

Why he would respond to this all with those Hapaboy quotations is unclear to me, for instance: My guess is that he thinks he's just throwing "our" words back at us - he even may see it as an artistic, ironic gesture, or it may be as childish a gesture as it looks, or even both - but, whatever the explanation, it makes me want to vote "weird," though not excluding "malicious."
More...

Very difficult to know. I suspect a clinical psychologist could take a stab at a diagnosis, based on what he has posted, his responses and lack thereof, his inability or unwillingness to interact with others, and his comments in the chat sessions....

and since I can only play a clinical psychologist on the internet, my in depth diagnosis is that he is a dick.

Without the ability to dialogue, without the ability to listen to inflection, tone, watch body language, without a third party to provide some objectivity on the dialogue, internet relationships or internet communities remain quite strange, don't they?

I find that after a while if you pay enough attention to folks who post on the internet with frequency, you will find out if they are for real, and if not you can witness their psychosis reveal itself in any number of ways over the course of time.
 
Quote from max401:

My guess is that wild is a MF (Muslim Fundamentalist).
More...

Never did thank you, max, for your work on the "Hunt the Boeing" thread, helping to debunk that conspiracy claptrap. So... thanks.

As for the issue of wild's origins, based on interactions in the chat room, I consider it highly unlikely that he's an Islamic Fundamentalist The gourmet cuisine and German rah-rah don't square with my usual picture of same. Having thought back, I also have to amend some comments of my own: I'm fairly confident that wild is capable of expressing himself in English with high proficiency. He may even have lived in the United States for an extended period of time, perhaps as a child. I didn't know whether to take him seriously, but during one stray exchange I believe he claimed to have attended elementary school here.

I think that narrows him down to eccentric Euro with big historical chip on his shoulder. Nuff said, IMO.
 
This is interesting, if it is accurate. Has anyone seen confirmation of this?



A US Media Mystery:
The Case of the Missing Information about Iraq’s Weapons
A Chronicle report

The major media in the US seem intent on following a script worthy of an Agatha Christie mystery. They lay out a few clues at best and withhold or obscure facts that could give you a better picture of why and how the crime was committed.

The plot? The missing 8,000 pages the United States edited out of Iraq’s 11,800-page dossier on weapons before it passed on a “sanitized” version to the 10 non-permanent members of the United Nations security council, according to a December 22 story in the Glasgow, Scotland Sunday Herald.

The five permanent members of the security council—the US, the UK, France, China and Russia—were given access to the complete “top secret” version of the dossier.

Secretary General of the UN Kofi Annan called it was ‘unfortunate’ that the UN had allowed the US to take the only complete dossier and edit it. Norway, a fellow (non-permanent) member of the Security Council, was miffed; its UN spokesperson said Norway felt like it was being treated like a “second-class country” because it wasn’t made privy to the complete dossier.

...

We watched and waited for more details, thinking surely our “major media” would be on the case, giving front-page coverage to this monumental mystery. But no—it was holiday time; the front pages were filled with stories about shoppers in malls and ruminations about North Korea. The crime of omission wasn’t even brought up.

The needed information came through on December 18 by way of a Geneva-based reporter, Andreas Zumach. He broke the story on the US national listener-sponsored radio and television show "Democracy Now!,” reporting that he had found that the missing pages provided the names of US corporations, government agencies and even nuclear labs that over the years have helped arm Iraq, and train Iraqi personnel in the use of these arms—illegally.

-cont-
http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/media_ommisions_jan03.shtml

http://www.thememoryhole.org/corp/iraq-suppliers.htm
 
The Biggest Threat To Peace

Which country really poses the greatest danger to world peace in 2003?

TIME asks for readers' views

Who really poses the greatest danger to world peace? Iraq and North Korea are certainly high on President Bush's list though Iraq is still working hard to deny him a reason to attack. A 12,000-page report on its nuclear, chemical and biological programs has been given to the United Nations but Bush and his dependable friend Tony Blair say they have "solid evidence" that Saddam is lying and have called for weapons inspection teams to step up their work.

Meanwhile, as the fuel rods go in and UN inspectors go away, the specter of a nuclear-armed North Korea is keeping the reclusive regime on everybody's radar. Washington and Pyongyang are talking tough but is the biggest danger to peace closer to home? European antagonism towards Bush's robust stance is now being mirrored in the U.S., with even those he might normally consider his allies now urging caution.

So TIME asks you: which country poses the greatest danger to world peace in 2003?

North Korea

Iraq

The United States

poll at http://www.time.com/time/europe/gdml/peace2003.html


regards

wild
 
Quote from wild:

The Biggest Threat To Peace

Which country really poses the greatest danger to world peace in 2003?

TIME asks for readers' views

Who really poses the greatest danger to world peace? Iraq and North Korea are certainly high on President Bush's list though Iraq is still working hard to deny him a reason to attack. A 12,000-page report on its nuclear, chemical and biological programs has been given to the United Nations but Bush and his dependable friend Tony Blair say they have "solid evidence" that Saddam is lying and have called for weapons inspection teams to step up their work.

Meanwhile, as the fuel rods go in and UN inspectors go away, the specter of a nuclear-armed North Korea is keeping the reclusive regime on everybody's radar. Washington and Pyongyang are talking tough but is the biggest danger to peace closer to home? European antagonism towards Bush's robust stance is now being mirrored in the U.S., with even those he might normally consider his allies now urging caution.

So TIME asks you: which country poses the greatest danger to world peace in 2003?

North Korea

Iraq

The United States

poll at http://www.time.com/time/europe/gdml/peace2003.html


regards

wild
More...

For the umpteenth time, Wild reposts the same link to the same articles....Ya Volt...I know nothing, nothing! Colonel Klink....

What a total moron who continues to post the same invalid internet poll on different threads to make a meaningless point.

Typical brain dead German mentality. They think if they keep doing something over and over again, it will finally mean something.

Too funny.
 
Pakistanis Flee to Canada and Uncertainty
Families Uprooted By INS Deadline


By Michael Powell
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 18, 2003; Page A01


ST-BERNARD DE LACOLLE, Quebec -- The Faroukhs walk across the border in the dark before dawn, a Bronx family about to become international flotsam. The wife pulls tight on her blue cloth coat against the minus 5-degree chill and wind, and tugs at the hand of her 5-year-old son. He's wrapped in a parka and carries a red King Babar backpack. They're crying.

"Cold," she whispers. "It's so cold."

Her husband walks 10 yards behind, pulling three stuffed valises wrapped in rope. He's a slender man, and his loafers slip and squeak in the snow.

They come in a steady stream to these border posts each week, hundreds of Pakistanis like the Faroukhs who have lived -- often for many years -- in the United States without legal residency papers. Pakistani men living as visitors in the United States have until Feb. 21 to register with the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The INS requires men from 25 nations considered security threats to register.

For those without visas in these nervous times since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, deportation is almost a certainty. Hundreds of registrants have been arrested since the program began Dec. 16. The detentions have sparked protests and demonstrations, and this week the INS extended deadlines, but also added five nations to the registration program.

Rather than wait for the inevitable, many Pakistanis have chosen to run, often with families in tow. They hope to obtain asylum in Canada.
...

more at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8619-2003Jan17.html

regards

wild


updated TIME poll results at http://www.time.com/time/europe/gdml/peace2003.html
 
No problems...Wild is simply a Grunt Artist......

The Wild Boy rapppppp.....

My name is Wild
and I'm happy while
I don't verbalize
If I can plagiarize
I just cut & paste
I am such a waste
but my brain is clear
as I'm no where near
having any idea
When I stop bitch - in'
I may be able to pitch in
I'll get a little brave - er
and talk with Elite Trader

bum a bung cha ......choo choo a cha...

( Eminem, Big Dirty Ice Dog Gut Bucket...... eat your titties off Wild is masssssssiiiiiive >> in the house )

huge regards,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top