Breitbart would rather defend alleged child molester Roy Moore than lose an election

[gwb-trading]

Link me to a source where this information that the reporters knew and didn't report on it. Also, was JFK a pedo and this wasn't reported by anyone? Sources? You do understand there is a huge difference between pedophilia and consensual sex between adults yes?

There is no clear instance since you are just making stuff up, post evidence that WaPo reporters knew JFK was a pedo and ignored those rumors.

Amusing -- coming from the guy who constantly insists that Trump raped a 13 year old -- which is completely dis-proven.

You can go read the books about the Washington Post yourself to eliminate your ignorance. I am not going to spend hours researching and posting links that you never read on a subject which has been well-documented by authors who were Washington Post reporters. Go to Amazon and make some purchases in the book section and learn something.

 

[exGOPer]

Amusing -- coming from the guy who constantly insists that Trump raped a 13 year old -- which is completely dis-proven.

You can go read the books about the Washington Post yourself to eliminate your ignorance. I am not going to spend hours researching and posting links that you never read on a subject which has been well-documented by authors who were Washington Post reporters. Go to Amazon and make some purchases in the book section and learn something.

'Completey disproven' because the accusers disappeared just as Trump threatened them?

Nothing was disproven, the accusers disappeared as they were likely killed or paid off by Trump's goons.

And you have no sources for your made up claims, I should read books for your fake claims? Which books are these? Name one. Which book from Amazon should I buy that mentions JFK and his pedophilia which WaPo reporters ignored? Can you even name one? LOL

Who are you kidding with this BS?

 

[gwb-trading]

'Completey disproven' because the accusers disappeared just as Trump threatened them?

Nothing was disproven, the accusers disappeared as they were likely killed or paid off by Trump's goons.

And you have no sources for your made up claims, I should read books for your fake claims? Which books are these? Name one. Which book from Amazon should I buy that mentions JFK and his pedophilia which WaPo reporters ignored? Can you even name one? LOL

Who are you kidding with this BS?

Guess you prefer to wallow in ignorance.

The topic we are discussing is the Washington's Post decline in the quality of their reporting. Stick with the subject. Today the WP is nothing more than a smut tabloid.

 

[exGOPer]

Guess you prefer to wallow in ignorance.

The topic we are discussing is the Washington's Post decline in the quality of their reporting. Stick with the subject. Today the WP is nothing more than a smut tabloid.

Again, name these so called books which back up your claims, I will buy and research them for enlightenment. Why do you refuse to even name the books which supposedly contain proof for your claims?

And this was never the discussion on WaPo's decline, that's pure deflection. This logical fallacy is called attacking the source, it's very common and won't work.

 

[gwb-trading]

Again, name these so called books which back up your claims, I will buy and research them for enlightenment. Why do you refuse to even name the books which supposedly contain proof for your claims?

And this was never the discussion on WaPo's decline, that's pure deflection. This logical fallacy is called attacking the source, it's very common and won't work.

Someone who is ignorant of the primary authors of books about the Washington Post shouldn't really be posting in a politics forum. Let's start with Bob Woodward -- who covered many interesting topics in the large number of books he authored.

This is a good exercise for you to take personal responsibility to learn something for a change. Research and get back to me with the list of books you plan to read and I will tell you if they are appropriate.

 

[exGOPer]

Someone who is ignorant of the primary authors of books about the Washington Post shouldn't really be posting in a politics forum. Let's start with Bob Woodward -- who covered many interesting topics in the large number of books he authored.

This is a good exercise for you to take personal responsibility to learn something for a change. Research and get back to me with the list of books you plan to read and I will tell you if they are appropriate.

What has Woodward got to do with your claims about JFK's pedophilia being ignored by WaPo reporters?

Reading Woodward's book which I actually did long time back has got to do with your claims?

Seriously, this is how you debate a topic? Changing and deflecting the issue to defend your made up claims?