Breitbart would rather defend alleged child molester Roy Moore than lose an election

[gwb-trading]

Roy Moore never ran for a national seat in the past, that's what caused this story to be 'dug up' when in fact this was common knowledge that Moore is a pedophile.

NE makes stuff up everyday, I can post multiple false claims from them that they never retracted. To compare that to a pedo being outed by WaPo who tried to have a vote on national issues is a false equivalence at the level of Breitbart.

The Washington's Post new motto introduced in early 2017 is "Democracy Dies in Darkness" which was universally mocked across the country by media pundits.

In view of the Post's current reporting it is only little better than "Hold me, Anakin, like you did by the lake on Naboo!"

The old slogan was "“The paper that digs deeper.” -- which the Washington Post used to do for political policy stories. Not anymore, the Post is too busy sending reporters to remote states to dig up sexual dirt on people.

So let me ask -- provide one example prior 2010 where the Washington Post took the lead in hunting down sexual dirt on someone and reporting on it. Well let me provide an answer -- there are no examples -- until the Post recently became a smut magazine.

The Washington Post may have reported on the John Edwards situation and the Thomas/Hill controversy -- it did not send reporters out to interview the women and dig up dirt. Very much different than the behavior of the Post management today.

 

[gwb-trading]

Also, NE doesn't send reporters, they hear something and publish it as fact, 9 times out of 10 it's a complete hoax. I doubt NE even has reporters.

Actually the National Enquirer has more reporters than the Washington Post. Most however are independent contractors (authors / contributors) who are paid per story or photo.

 

[exGOPer]

The Washington's Post new motto introduced in early 2017 is "Democracy Dies in Darkness" which was universally mocked across the country by media pundits.

In view of the Post's current reporting it is only little better than "Hold me, Anakin, like you did by the lake on Naboo!"

The old slogan was "“The paper that digs deeper.” -- which the Washington Post used to do for political policy stories. Not anymore, the Post is too busy sending reporters to remote states to dig up sexual dirt on people.

So let me ask -- provide one example prior 2010 where the Washington Post took the lead in hunting down sexual dirt on someone and reporting on it. Well let me provide an answer -- there are no examples -- until the Post recently became a smut magazine.

The Washington Post may have reported on the John Edwards situation and the Thomas/Hill controversy -- it did not send reporters out to interview the women and dig up dirt. Very much different than the behavior of the Post management today.

Reporters went to cover the Senate race where they found evidence of pedophilia, your characterization of the events is laughable Breitbart spin.

 

[exGOPer]

Actually the National Enquirer has more reporters than the Washington Post. Most however are independent contractors (authors / contributors) who are paid per story or photo.

Hahahahahah, sure they have more 'reporters' and 'contractors' which is where they found this gem

 

[gwb-trading]

Reporters went to cover the Senate race where they found evidence of pedophilia, your characterization of the events is laughable Breitbart spin.

Your spin is amusing --- When in the history of the Washington Post have their reporters ever chased down and interviewed women about decades old claims concerning sexual behavior? Just name one instance!

 

[gwb-trading]

Hahahahahah, sure they have more 'reporters' and 'contractors' which is where they found this gem

Shortly it will be difficult to tell the difference between the cover of the Washington Post and National Enquirer.

 

[exGOPer]

Your spin is amusing --- When in the history of the Washington Post have their reporters ever chased down and interviewed women about decades old claims concerning sexual behavior? Just name one instance!

That's not how it works.

Show me one instance where there WaPo reporters went to cover a campaign as a routine, found something damaging and then never pursued it.

Name one instance!

You can't.

You are inventing a reverse scenario because you don't have any other defense for your fellow pedo Con, so you are attacking the source.

 

[exGOPer]

Shortly it will be difficult to tell the difference between the cover of the Washington Post and National Enquirer.

Yes and this will happen when Mexico pays for the wall and everyone has great health insurance as promised.

 

[gwb-trading]

That's not how it works.

Show me one instance where there WaPo reporters went to cover a campaign as a routine, found something damaging and then never pursued it.

Name one instance!

You can't.

You are inventing a reverse scenario because you don't have any other defense for your fellow pedo Con, so you are attacking the source.

Did the Washington Post cover JFK's sexual activities. There is plenty of information to show that their reporters at the time knew about all the rumors, etc. -- yet the paper never pursued it either during his campaign, nor after he was elected.

So there is your one clear instance.... and there are many more. You can go research them. Bob Woodward covered many of them in his books.

 

[exGOPer]

Did the Washington Post cover JFK's sexual activities. There is plenty of information to show that their reporters at the time knew about all the rumors, etc. -- yet the paper never pursued it either during his campaign, nor after he was elected.

So there is your one clear instance.... and there are many more. You can go research them. Bob Woodward covered many of them in his books.

Link me to a source where this information that the reporters knew and didn't report on it. Also, was JFK a pedo and this wasn't reported by anyone? Sources? You do understand there is a huge difference between pedophilia and consensual sex between adults yes?

There is no clear instance since you are just making stuff up, post evidence that WaPo reporters knew JFK was a pedo and ignored those rumors.