The thing is, there is another way to play these. Which is to only get involed when these trash stocks are overextended and time them well in the shorts. You get the benefit of being able to play them bigger (and hence, you wont need a lot of these to make more than many small shorts) and the approach will have an overall sharpe ratio. I interviewed an specialist of this approach (he usually shorts overextended small cap Nasdaq stocks but sometimes OTCs as well) and will add to the 2nd edition of my book. I can send you the PDF of the the unedited chapter if you want. He goes by the nickname of lx21 on twitter. he has an website as wellI'm not sure if you read the article I posted above which profiled John Hempton.
(Did you read the article?)
He has similar views to mine - no need to worry about short-term gyrations if appropriate position sizing is used.
Again I'll quote Hempton, as it seems you may have missed it:
"The thing about shorts is that you often know the endgame entirely. ... Gravity tends to work. But you don’t know when.The whole thing is seductive because the profits are guaranteed if you can hold the position. This can be very hard because a stock can go up five times before it collapses."
and
"To offset that timing risk, we want to have a small stake in hundreds of shorts."
SID could very well go bankrupt. There is no need to worry about a bounce from 0.97 to 1.31 today if it's going much lower than 0.97.
.
I believe this year he made a lot of money shorting VLTC with big size