Probably for the same reason anyone wouldn't. Leverage. It basically warns Comey to be honest, or else he might find himself going up against a recording (if there actually are such recordings). A bluff, perhaps. Who knows? You don't, I don't.
I didn't imply that there are tapes - Trump did. We don't know because Trump made the claim and he isn't forthcoming on it unlike Comey who acknowledged there are memos to the press.
Can you show a case where an FBI personal memo was used as evidence to convict someone without any other evidence backing it? Honest question.
Did you even read yesterday's reporting, it was mentioned in there about the status of FBI memos in courts.
Oh yeah, sure you didn't. You're as hyper-partisan as anyone can be.
This is from the guy who was posting 'Democrat' 'Rich' hoax yesterday.
An email from an individual that was obtained is also considered evidence in court. .
Sure it is except what crimes are you accusing Podesta of in the first place.
That's what I want to know, and that's why I asked you to be specific.
WHAT CRIMES DID PODESTA COMMIT for which the emails are evidence.