Blackmail material on Trump?

[W.J. Feathermaker III]

All true. Apparently, there's some law against having a full time job and being a moderator in your world, though.

He is envious that he couldn't be a moderator...He would love nothing more than the power to "silence his critics".

 

[Tsing Tao]

All from the guy who can't find one critique of the outgoing administration.

(Then again, he spent a month mourning the loss of HRC...and he is from Canada...LOL)

I find that completely hilarious. A person who claims he has a balanced view of the world has no record of ever criticizing any action by a President who was in office for 8 years and cannot point anything the man ever did wrong. Even if you had a near perfect human being (of which Obama was most certainly not) in office, there'd be at least something.

How can anyone consider someone having a "balanced" view in that regard?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

There's no evidence Ricter is another handle. Jem made a guess and I said "maybe you're correct". To say Ricter is the new handle requires proof.

There's no evidence Russia is behind any hacking attempts, so to say it is definite requires proof.

I have yet to read a post from you suggesting that "maybe" the intelligence community is correct. You're completely dismissive of them, but you accommodate jem's fantasy with a "maybe."

 

[Tsing Tao]

He is envious that he couldn't be a moderator...He would love nothing more than the power to "silence his critics".

Since he was banned from this site, I'm sure he hates all moderators.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

He is envious that he couldn't be a moderator...He would love nothing more than the power to "silence his critics".

Some years ago, I was asked by Joe, ET's previous administrator, if I wanted to be a monitor. I said no.

 

[Tsing Tao]

I have yet to read a post from you suggesting that "maybe" the intelligence community is correct. You're completely dismissive of them, but you accommodate jem's fantasy with a "maybe."

What I've said before is the same each time: If there is evidence shown, I will be happy to reconsider. Until then, it's all speculation. You are entitled to your opinion, but to call it "fact" is just bullshit without evidence.

Keep trying, Freddie Snowflake. (Feather, you don't mind me borrowing that name, do you? It suits).

 

[Tsing Tao]

Some years ago, I was asked by Joe, ET's previous administrator, if I wanted to be a monitor. I said no.

Of course you were. Was this before or after you were banned?

 

[W.J. Feathermaker III]

No, there's no evidence. That's why I said "maybe".

You just keep on missing the point, or you're getting it just fine but don't want to admit it.

There's no evidence Ricter is another handle. Jem made a guess and I said "maybe you're correct". To say Ricter is the new handle requires proof.

There's no evidence Russia is behind any hacking attempts, so to say it is definite requires proof.

If you want to continue to be intentionally obtuse for the sake of having another flame war, I guess I can accommodate.

Hey, don't forget that Gayfly is more upset at the messenger of all the scandalous e-mails than he is with the contents of those e-mails. This is the mindset of left wing lemming.

I remember a few hardcore lefties completely disregarding ALL of the undercover video's, e-mail's, etc because, in their minds, they were "doctored" or "completely made up". Just remember that they always demand "proof", but when presented with "proof" (albeit the "smoking gun"), they will always discredit the source.

Like I said, Freddie Gayfly Thunderpussy would have been lying face down in an open field in Guyana in 1978...He is not in possession of critical thinking skills.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

All true. Apparently, there's some law against having a full time job and being a moderator in your world, though.

During business hours? Sure, bro, it's all good. Maybe you could put it on your resume and ask your boss at HQ for flex time.

 

[W.J. Feathermaker III]

What I've said before is the same each time: If there is evidence shown, I will be happy to reconsider. Until then, it's all speculation. You are entitled to your opinion, but to call it "fact" is just bullshit without evidence.

Keep trying, Freddie Snowflake. (Feather, you don't mind me borrowing that name, do you? It suits).

No not at all, I think it fits him perfectly.