Nope he didn't. I quess that's one of the perqs of running the company. If I had been in charge he would have had to explain why he broke one of his own rules.
Making rules and breaking them is justified because he owns the company? Why make rules if there are no consequences when violated
I read something something about a character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking
I don't publish rules, but since you follow my crypto macro thread, you are aware that I sold 1 BTC at $25K. It's consequence of when I used cash to purchase MSTR options and the effects of risk between cash and crypto portfolio, hence rebalanced at a stop loss of $25K/btc
If there are no consequences, I'd keep breaking my own risk management cash vis a vis crypto portfolio. Did I need to sell 1 btc? no, but I'm not Buffett, and make rules that have no consequences
-----
https://fortune.com/2022/02/16/warren-buffett-invested-1-billion-crypto-bank/
