Birthers Hail Judge’s Decision That Could “Depose” Obama

[Eight]

Obama will send troops into Georgia, make sure he gets elected and then equate it with the Civil Rights movement. The MSM will air videos backing him up and making us all feel sorry for people that had to ride in the back of the bus.

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from Eight:

Obama will send troops into Georgia, make sure he gets elected and then equate it with the Civil Rights movement. The MSM will air videos backing him up and making us all feel sorry for people that had to ride in the back of the bus.

Yes, because you and people like luke will forever be trying to roll back the clock. I do truly thank you for making me see this. I was indeed blinded before.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

1.
you got the burden regarding production of evidence, wrong. If someone wants to be on the ballot and they are challenged in court, the burden would be on the potential candidate to produce some proof of eligibility. Not presenting evidence was done so at Obama's peril... learn the law dipshit. Kemp told you that. Learn to read.

2. Obama was supoenaed to appear, and documents in his possession were subpoenaed. learn the facts dipshit.

Wasn't talking about production of evidence.
Someone challenges a candidates name in court, they first need a valid challenge. Frivolous or malevolent, or in this case both those and a fuckwitted birfer challenge, don't require proofs against , you f'kn loon, because of what they are.

Administrative law judges as Malihi is in this case , don't have the authority to compel testimony. That would take an order from the Superior Court.

Take your own advice and "learn the law dipshit."

 

[stu]

Quote from RCG Trader:

Yes, because you and people like luke will forever be trying to roll back the clock. I do truly thank you for making me see this. I was indeed blinded before.

Doesn't he fly too? A regressive and a birther in charge of an airplane. :eek: That's pushing luck and providence a bit too hard.

 

[jficquette]

Quote from stu:

Wasn't talking about production of evidence.
Someone challenges a candidates name in court, they first need a valid challenge. Frivolous or malevolent, or in this case both those and a fuckwitted birfer challenge, don't require proofs against , you f'kn loon, because of what they are.

Administrative law judges as Malihi is in this case , don't have the authority to compel testimony. That would take an order from the Superior Court.

Take your own advice and "learn the law dipshit."

You have no clue as to how our system works yet you keep embarrassing yourself by pretending you do.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from RCG Trader:

...will forever be trying to roll back the clock....

Ah our daily dose of leftist drivel.

 

[Spike Trader]

Quote from Lucrum:

"At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Deemed not relevant by the judge.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.."

Lord help us . . . now that Lukie has learnt to cut and paste , there's never going to be an end to it . .

 

[pspr]

Quote from RCG Trader:

Yes, because you and people like luke will forever be trying to roll back the clock. I do truly thank you for making me see this. I was indeed blinded before.

I've got news for you. You are still blind.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Spiker:

. . . now that Lukie has learnt to cut and paste...

Now if only YOU could learn to read and write.

 

[Spike Trader]

Quote from jficquette:

You have no clue as to how our system works yet you keep embarrassing yourself by pretending you do.

Madam . . . . i do hope they never call you for jury duty . .