Birthers Hail Judgeâs Decision That Could âDeposeâ Obama
- Thread starter Mvector
- Start date
The lefties defending Obama are down playing the authority of the judge in Georgia by saying:
Specifically, Georgia Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi convened a hearing on Thursday in Atlanta to hear the merits of a complaint regarding said eligibility. And while Obama was subpoenaed to attend the hearing, neither he nor his attorney, Michael Jablonski, showed up to give their side of the story.
Malihi has no authority in the case beyond making a recommendation to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp â the public official statutorily charged with enforcing the integrity of the Georgia ballot.
http://www.fitsnews.com/2012/01/27/is-georgia-now-birther-country/
So, according to this story, the ruling by the judge will only be a recommendation and not a binding finding.
Specifically, Georgia Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi convened a hearing on Thursday in Atlanta to hear the merits of a complaint regarding said eligibility. And while Obama was subpoenaed to attend the hearing, neither he nor his attorney, Michael Jablonski, showed up to give their side of the story.
Malihi has no authority in the case beyond making a recommendation to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp â the public official statutorily charged with enforcing the integrity of the Georgia ballot.
http://www.fitsnews.com/2012/01/27/is-georgia-now-birther-country/
So, according to this story, the ruling by the judge will only be a recommendation and not a binding finding.
Stu you ignoramus... that was not a touche... that is what the point of these proceeding were. That is what I said needed to happen and would happen. You and optional and AK have been ignorant asses for a few years. All that needed to happen was for Obama to be vetted.
The plaintiffs asked a court to make sure the state board did its job and ensured that candidates were eligible for the position they sought.
All Obama really had to do was submit an birth certificate or some other evidence under penalty of perjury. By doing so, he would have most likely met is initial burden of production.
It would have been then incumbent on the plaintiffs to challenge that evidence. The court would have then weighed the evidence made a finding and submitted that finding to a state board.
That is the rule of law. That is america in action.
You loons have been against a very American process.
LOL !!!,So the judge really has no power but the power to recommend
You birthers and your birthing circus are entertaining I'll give you that LOL !!!
This is being reported on some blogs:
From Plaintiff, in one of the Georgia challenges, Carl Swensson: To all my friends in battle,
The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this⦠Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with âBirtherâ Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.
Now weâre merely awaiting the publishing of this Judgeâs ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. - Carl
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-ballot-hearing-judge-wanted-to.html
From Plaintiff, in one of the Georgia challenges, Carl Swensson: To all my friends in battle,
The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this⦠Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with âBirtherâ Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.
Now weâre merely awaiting the publishing of this Judgeâs ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. - Carl
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-ballot-hearing-judge-wanted-to.html