Quote from Spydertrader:
Years ago while reading through the USENET archives I stumbled onto a series of posts which described the relationship Volume had to Price. At the time, the post seemed to generate significant controversy (not unlike today). After studying the various posts made by Jack, and instituting a rule set with equities which I felt followed the intent of Jack's posts, I found I could profit quite handsomely.
A serendipidous conversation (via paltalk) one evening motivated me to 'pay foreward', (as requested) that which I had learned. As a result, I started a journal on ET in an effort to transfer the experience I had attained.
While I never expected to still post after 3 years, I find it quite rewarding to lend a hand simply by keeping a promise made over 4 years ago. Since then, I've not only made enough money to place me in a lifestyle I enjoy, I have also had the opportunity (thanks to Jack) to meet some truly incredible individuals.
In the end, it all comes down to thanking someone, who by their very nature shared a truly incredible piece of insight, but also, shared the importance of helping others. It's been a fantastic debt to repay.
- Spydertrader
Spyder,
I find the posts of the detractors quite amusing. Amusing in the fact that so many don't even take the time to pause and think about what they are writing before they post.
The simple truth is, it is HIGHLY unlikely that any individual would continue posting diligently, year after year, to simply "fool" people with a phantom method that simply doesn't offer the consistency and profitability it claims.
The hard-lined truth is that many of these people are simply NOT WILLING to do the work necessary to understand and evaluate the method. This means putting in the screen time, both off-line and real-time, to practice drawing channels and gaussians, and properly annotating the charts. This housekeeping is vital to collecting all necessary information in the "here and now" so that proper action may be taken to stay in sync with the market.
ET in general has a strong sense of entitlement. I suppose this is indicative of how America thinks in general. If the system doesn't work for me, then dammit, its the system creators' fault, not mine!
The reality is that burden of investigation lies on the shoulders of those attempting to learning the method. There is no burden of proof placed on the teachers. There is no need to pacify the detractors with audited records, cash PNL statements, etc. etc.
The plain truth is that you and Jack Hershey have and continue to demonstrate ENORMOUS generosity, not only in the level of detail of SCT you are willing to reveal, but also in your persistence and dedication to teaching the method itself.
As the days pass I am quickly "getting" the effectiveness of channels, and hope to start peeling off the first onion layer of beginner trading methods soon.
Enjoy your weekend,
RoughTrader