Not too long ago I wrote that, given the features of the 70-minute baseline, a trader ought to be able to reap the greatest amount of return by entering positions when this measure reverses direction, except that it will often go into a holding pattern rather than follow through... and who knows in which direction it might head after that?
Well, after reintroducing the 2½-hour baseline in my computer models, here are some related thoughts...
First of all, it doesn't matter that no one knows in which direction price might go after heading into consolidation. Simply wait for it to "tip its hat," often by nudging the degree of slope on the lower-panel histogram to above 0.091 or to below -0.091, and then act accordingly.
There is a lot of space (lag) between the red 2½-hour baseline and the dark brown 70-minute baseline, so I'm going to plot a green 1.83-hour moving average in between them.
You are primarily looking for pullbacks in the blue instantaneous moving averages. But, do NOT use this strategy when the 2½-hour and 70-minute baselines are not sloping in the same direction.
If you DO decide to trade a longer-term reversal, wait for agreement in the longer-term measures. For example, trying to short this pair based on the dark brown 70-minute baseline turning south without waiting for agreement from the red 2½-hour measure could have gotten you into trouble...
It's better to wait for agreement between the brown 70- and red 250-minute moving averages, as eventually occurred here:
Also, if you see the red 2½-hour measure baseline flattening out, do not
count on the 70-minute baseline continuing even a
pronounced trend. It
could be an "omen" of sorts predicting that the faster measure's ht soon momentum might soon weaken as well.
You are probably looking at a reversal as well if and when candlesticks reach the opposite side of the 70-minute price range envelope at 0.20% deviation. If nothing changes, no doubt the 70-minute baseline will almost immediately be pulled the other way, right along with them.