After exiting my AUDUSD position for a gain of $8, doing so three hours before expiry in an effort to play it safe before the release of U.S. and Canadian economic data scheduled for about an hour later (thereby forfeiting the
additional $55 I would have pocketed had I waited for the full payout) I had high hopes of picking up a good chunk of that cash after all, when about three hours later, a number of pairs began to evidence structures suggesting the likelihood that they might be primed to reverse direction and head back toward the levels from which they came.
I determined that the best two candidates based on my numbers were AUDUSD and GBPUSD, and I was thinking that the Aussie-U.S. dollar might be the better choice, because it had jettisoned itself to a more extreme level, giving it that much more reason to turn around and head the other way, whereas GBPUSD, which was positioned at a less radical level, had much more room to continue to run.
However, there are many times when this kind of situation does not unfold as one might have hoped, because the reason the more remotely positioned asset has reached the level it did was because there were significant (fundamental) factors or influences driving it to do so, making it stubborn or reluctant to relent to any pressure to turn around and head back the other way. And this seems to be what was taking place this morning.
Had I chosen GBPUSD instead of AUDUSD, my contract would have been in the money from the very next hour—no worries...
But no, I had to make the mistake of selecting AUDUSD, and consequently, I found myself waiting hour after hour for the Aussie-U.S. dollar to finally drop...
which it never did!
Two hours too late to do me any good...