This contract was in-the-money at expiry, but quite frankly, things could have gone either way. Price came all the way back down below the strike price and spent the last hour before midnight vacillating above and below 1.3900. This was not a reliable tactic/strategy at all.
In hindsight, it looks to me like when you purchased this contract, the two-hour trend was bearish. Consequently, the solution might be to purchase contracts only when the two- and six-hour trends are both in alignment.
Another possibility is consulting the two-hour price range. For instance, right now GBPUSD's 4- and 6-hour trends look to be bearish, but it is not clear whether the 2-hour trend is trying to transition to bullish. Nonetheless, with the longer-term baselines definitely sloping downward, and the rate located near the top of the 2-hour price range at the 0.28% deviation level, isn't price much more likely to fall than to climb up to 1.3940?
Put this notion to the test by purchasing an in-the-money put contract with a strike price of 1.3940.
You make $13.25 if you're right and part with -$86.75 if you're wrong (so you'd
better be right).
UPDATE: After taking a second look, I'm thinking the 4-hour baseline might actually be neutral. So, a possible flaw in the above logic is that if the 2-hour envelope
is reversing north, with the intraday trend transitioning from bearish to bullish, and the 6-hour baseline simply being too lagging to reflect such a reality in a timely fashion, this
could very easily end up being a losing trade.
Let's see what happens...