People get fired all the time for no fulfilling duties all the while the boss still likes the person they are letting go. The bottom line is, if they don't contest the application, the party will get unemployment. So, oxymoron my ass.
I made no such point that IL was different. I specifically pointed out IL because I only have examples from IL. I simply didn't know if other states act the same way. Anyway, I know this is true at least in IL because someone extremely close to me was let go for not meeting performance guidelines in their customer service job. They were fired (not laid off) and they received unemployment benefits regardless.
I normally enjoy your skepticism, but your overconfidence in what you don't know is your undoing.
I made no such point that IL was different. I specifically pointed out IL because I only have examples from IL. I simply didn't know if other states act the same way. Anyway, I know this is true at least in IL because someone extremely close to me was let go for not meeting performance guidelines in their customer service job. They were fired (not laid off) and they received unemployment benefits regardless.
I normally enjoy your skepticism, but your overconfidence in what you don't know is your undoing.
Quote from TraderZones:
this is an oxymoron; if you are fired you DID burn the bridge...
Also, it is doubtful that getting fired will collect unemployment in IL. States tend to follow the same set of rules. In fact, on this IL page, it is called LAID OFF WORKER ASSISTANCE:
http://www.illinoisworknet.com/vos_portal/residents/en/Services/Unemployment_Insurance_Application/