The reason I lost 40% was
it confirmed that my actual strategy is not the problem but my fear of losing is
And it the very reason you will continue to lose
We've all had to face it - some get past it..., some don't
RN
The reason I lost 40% was
it confirmed that my actual strategy is not the problem but my fear of losing is
And it the very reason you will continue to lose
We've all had to face it - some get past it..., some don't
RN
Im not afraid of risking 1% to gain 3%+.
I was risking 5-10% to gain 10-20%+
Then why did I read where your losers were equal to / double your winners
RN
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%Im not afraid of risking 1% to gain 3%+.
I was risking 5-10% to gain 10-20%+
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10% is quite aggressive, especially when [NOT IF] but when trend changes;
less than 10 times + you are out[slippage, commissions].But then, that IS why the old timers say cut back when losing; you can get an education with an increase size when losing .But wisdom says don't try this @ home.