Quote from Martinghoul:
I am open to all ideas... I am not looking to create a bet myself. I am looking for us to create a mutually satisfactory one that we're all happy with.
I mean the simplest way would be just a bet on interest rates by some particular date. Alternatively, we can choose home sales, nominal or real GDP, budget deficit, tax receipts, NFP, unemployment rate, participation rate, or any combination of the above.
The problem with things like betting on interest rates is that you're asking me (or you) to put faith in what the Fed is going to do. Given that I'd never have believed the Fed would resort to it's current level of insanity in the first place, that doesn't bode well for me predicting future insanity.
Again, if you want to bet, put up something definitive. If you don't, don't. I'm not here to put a wager on some random economic statistic. To sum up how the thread has gone thus far...
1. I posted Rick Santelli.
2. You posted that you dislike Rick.
3. We argued why that was, and came up with you not liking him in the end.
4. I asked you questions on the Fed, calling you an apologist of the Fed.
5. You were surprised at this and clarified that you support the institution, but have frequently disagreed with the Fed.
6. Once that was clear, I asked if you supported current QE.
7. You said you supported previous versions, but not the one now.
8. I asked what had changed.
9. You said economic back drop had improved.
10. I asked you for specifics, and you posted an article which didn't have anything that improved, but had a lot of supposition on why economic data
would improve.
11. I posted an argument against that article piece by piece.
12. You said we can make a bet, but then said you don't necessarily want a bet (I don't either, so no idea why that is the topic now). All I wanted was an understanding of why you think data
has improved, as reasoning for why you no longer support QE.
Did that sum it up correctly? Feel free to tweak.