Ok.Originally posted by KymarFye
Nitro, Catman...
I'm happy to see you engaged here, I respect you both, and I enjoy discussion and exploration, but I think we've gotten off track:
I'm NOT dissatisfied with my approach to trading.
I seek constant improvement, and I am not "satisfied" in the sense of believing I've nothing more to learn, but I'm not looking for a new way to trade. I'm just focusing on what I consider to be some last, critical obstacles in the way of my success.
I'm NOT seeking some new "answer" to seemingly intractable "problems."
Again, I appreciate and enjoy discussion, but there's a point where well-intended suggestions begin to seem condescending. It doesn't make much sense, for instance, to cite my earlier efforts at self-analysis and put them before me as though they represent unaddressed or unconsidered issues. I'm sorry if some dramatic language on my part, some perhaps excessive confession, or some failures in explaining my approach have given a wrong impression, but I'm NOT seeking answers from the readers of this journal. If I were that desperate, I would not seek answers by keeping a journal here. I'd go elsewhere.
I'm actually feeling pretty good about where I am.
I wouldn't be planning to increase position size if that wasn't so.
As I said, I believe I have identified and isolated a couple of critical problems. I also believe that they must be addressed within the parameters of my methodology, not by direct interpolation from some alternative methodology. Moreover, I feel confident that I am addressing these problems effectively. I know what I'm doing, I have an edge, and I'm getting better and better as a trader. I do not trade the same set-ups, vehicles, or parameters as you guys do, and probably could not do so effectively, just as you two might very well have a lot of difficulty working with what I work with.
nitro