Beating Larry Williams record

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally posted by sabena
Your comparision with becoming Microsoft 2 makes no sense.
Bill Gates was just a clever guy in the right place, the right
time and with the right product , with right people around him.

He was dependent from a lot of external factors around him.
And that means that luck played a very big part in his
succes.


My trading is not dependent from the character of market.
Satistically there is no correlation with the behavior of
the market.
The only thing I need is liquidity. I don't need to market
or sell my product and be dependent from the economic
climat.

When your succes is not dependent from external factors,
then that means you make your own luck, and not that
you have to be lucky.

Larry Williams came never anywhere close to what he did
in 1987 that just the prove that he was lucky.

My advice to you, follow a course probability and then maybe
you understand me if you are smart enough...


Interesting you find the need to insult my intelligence. Care to challenge me to an IQ test, boast about the schools we have been to, countries we have studied in, etc. etc. etc? Or maybe we should just whip out our dicks and see who's is bigger?

Ok, so how do you explain the fact that making the kind of money- or rather, annual percentage return would be more correct- that Larry Williams made, WITHOUT taking monster risks, has never been done before. Ever. By anyone.

If it is so "simple," why has no one done it? Is everyone else stupid or incompetent? Do you have an edge that no other trader has anywhere?

Wall Street is littered with "quants" who can do powerful equations and high powered calculus but are crippled by the fact that they have no damn common sense.
 
Originally posted by sabena
Tom_p



Please follow first a course probability and then come
back, I had it here.

See you in 2003.

Let's arrange to meet in the chatroom and we'll see who needs the course in probability. Name the time, so that others can enjoy the spectacle.
 
Originally posted by sabena
Tom_p



Please follow first a course probability and then come
back, I had it here.

See you in 2003.



The best daytraders, floor traders and market makers in existence peak out at 500% to 1,000% annual returns- a thousand percent return is pretty much top level for these guys, who have more of an edge and lower transaction costs than you will ever see- and yet your daytrading is casually going to beat them by a factor of ten.

Who is the one smoking plastic when it comes to probability here? Hmmmm?

I'm sorry but you are stupid, dude. This is not a random insult, it's based on observation from your posts.
 
Or maybe we should just whip out our dicks and see who's is bigger


This is the funniest thing I have ever read on these board's. You gotta keep this up.
 
It's not a combination of powerfull equations.

The beauty lies in the simplicity.


Albert Einstein: "Things should be made as simple as possible
but not any simpler"


E= M*C^2


can it be any simpler......?
 
Well Sabena I can't wait to witness this attempt at superhuman trading, I hope you make it cause I love learning about the game. You have a start date yet?
 
You make your observations from my posts.

Shouldn't it smarter to do that from my trading statistics..?

Who is the dude here.....?

Seeing is believing.

If we organize a bet, I will be curious to see how much
you will bet, then be consequent and put your money
where you put your words if you have the balls.....
 
okay i tell you what:

if you can make a verified 10,000 percent return in one year, i will let myself be anally raped by an aids infested gorilla and send the tape to Bob Saget for the 2004 edition of America's Funniest Home Videos.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top