Baron
ET Founder
Dumbest argument ever. That's like saying there will be fewer buyers for a mansion in Los Angeles because regular-sized homes are being built in regular neighborhoods all over the country. A scarce and desirable asset is not impacted over the long term by the production of assets at much lower quality and higher frequency. To compare Bitcoin to some shitcoin whose supply was produced by a keystroke is like trying to compare a mansion in L.A. with a production house in Nebraska. According to your argument, nobody in their right mind would every buy a mansion in California or a penthouse in New York because there are so many choices of regular homes everywhere.Sure, but this argument also goes against the whole crypto economy. Crypto supply increased by gazillion % in the last few years, because of new coins and forks. A simple fork increases BTC's supply by 100%.
You may say there is only one BTC, but that is not actually true in this case, because incoming money has now more choices and it spreads out among many more coins. Aka, competition, that acts as inflation, if you wish.