btw, Z... on the thread that Reardon cited above, you seemed to make a mistake in interpretation of the chart which formed the basis for discussion there... the mistake was an innocent one. It was pointed out to you, but then you started a bizarre series of posts in which you continued to claim that your original interpretation was correct, even though it was clear that it was an innocent mistake. I asked you in another thread to clarify your position on this - did you ever post a retraction?
Also, there are some other questions that remain outstanding, including questions about your evocation of images on Nazi Germany and your subsequent denial of the suggestion that the use of the phrase 'Goose-steppers' in reference to your political opponents was an example of such an evocation.
Also, we were wondering about your change of heart regarding your use of the phrase 'magistrates materialized out of pure potentiality', which you used in the ID thread. In a subsequent thread, you seem to disavow your statement that the origin of humans on earth is the process of 'magistrates (being) materialized out of pure potentiality'. Did you have a change of heart with regard to this statement?
There are quite a few other questions that remain - could you link us to your response to any of these issues? And if you have not provided such a response, then how are we to assess your posts here on ET? Is it debate you are looking for or are you doing what RM claims you are doing - that is, simply posting material that you know will get a reaction, for the sake of getting that reaction? I guess the question is, do you believe in any of the things you say, and if you do, then why will you not respond to calmly stated challenges to those beliefs? Are you willing to debate, or are you using ET as some sort of personal pulpit?
Thanks, Nik