---and crickets from the left---Alibamy legacy crumbling as we speak and it's high time. --Let him be a footnote in history*.
*Alibamy
---and crickets from the left---Alibamy legacy crumbling as we speak and it's high time. --Let him be a footnote in history*.
*Alibamy
---and crickets from the left---Today will live as a great day in American history. Today was the day that Obamacare was effectively repealed. The cornerstone of Obamacare was the individual mandate and you can now kiss that ridiculous power grab goodbye.
I debate everyone of my points, I don't copy paste the same bullshit again and again due to lack of intellectual capabilities like some here.
And you can't read GDP numbers in isolation, you have to read trends which your ilk is incapable of. Job growth has slowed to its weakest in 6 years but you are hanging on to GDP numbers as if they are infallible.
Barack Hussein O. was the first president in US history to not have at least one year of 3% GDP growth.
Because there is no slowing job growth for substantial jobs. Under BHO, the rules were changed to show jobs at 30 hours as "full time" jobs when in fact people were having to get two jobs to survive. Thus, there were more jobs created--- but not really.Why aren't you folks taking credit for slowing job market though?
Because there is no slowing job growth for substantial jobs. Under BHO, the rules were changed to show jobs at 30 hours as "full time" jobs when in fact people were having to get two jobs to survive. Thus, there were more jobs created--- but not really.
Yes changed immediately.And that rule was changed back under Trump?
Yes changed immediately.
No.The criteria are not the same. The Hussein administration cooked the books on full time employment when it was really part time. That is not how it is calculated now. The Hussein numbers are faux. Noone said YOU changed anything.I didn't change shit,I pointed out the fallacy in your argument - if Obama changed those numbers to make them look good and Trump hasn't changed it back then what difference does it make at all? Both numbers are using the same criteria
No.The criteria is not the same. The Hussein administration cooked the books on full time employment when it was really part time. That is not how it is calculated now. The Hussein numbers are faux. Noone said YOU changed anything.