yes, if he's picking 50 stocks, however he's doing that (i'd like to know how and based on what criteria...), and 5 are profitable, 45 aren't, therefore, 90% losers. that's simple enough math is it not?
i'm aware of the use of filters to look for movers. i just don't like them as much as knowing what stocks will move and why, pre or post-market, either going into the open, or preparing for after the close. i'm speaking of news event driven stocks, and earnings reports, not extraordinary events or major market volatility events.
i will have to test this strategy out in the future. right now, what works for me is making me more than "a good six figure income", closer to 7, so no need to change it. tweak it, maybe.
i'm aware of the use of filters to look for movers. i just don't like them as much as knowing what stocks will move and why, pre or post-market, either going into the open, or preparing for after the close. i'm speaking of news event driven stocks, and earnings reports, not extraordinary events or major market volatility events.
i will have to test this strategy out in the future. right now, what works for me is making me more than "a good six figure income", closer to 7, so no need to change it. tweak it, maybe.
Quote from lwlee:
90% losers?
He places 50 orders and usually gets filled on 10% (5 trades) of those orders. Of those 5 trades, the win/loss is 75% for newbies. Don seems to do better in this thread. Picking the stocks could be automated. Look for gaps in after hours trading.