Quote from 1a2b3cppp:
Well, if fibs are as magical as everyone thinks they are, then there is no risk of ruin
I used to have an entire bookcase full of trading books from when I was learning, but I've sold most of them because they were worthless. A few of them had some advice that gets quoted all over every trading forum, like "don't let a winner turn into a loser" and "learn to control your emotions," but none of that is really helpful if you think about it.
The rest were full of like Dr. Elder saying "look here's my Force Index indicator I created, and look how well it works on these cherry picked charts!!!!!"
Or a bunch of after the fact the fact trendlines. Hey, what about all those other trendlines you could have drawn that wouldn't have worked?
Who is "obviously much smarter than" me? The people that write the shitty books? Or the people that flame me because I make more money than they do with a smaller account size?
Sure. But let's not forget how often losses actually happen.
Last week, in 17 trades I had two losses. Average win size $450, average loss size -$679.
If someone had a 99% win rate where their winners were +1 but their losers were -20, and an account size of 100, would you tell them not to trade because 5 losses would wipe them out?
Now I understand that people who martingale make the similar arguments... "omg I have 99% win rate!!!" but they also usually have no stop loss and it takes one loss to blow them out. I have a hard stop defined for every trade before I even enter.
At my current size, it will take approximiately 73 consecutive losses to blow my account. Of course, before then I would no longer have enough margin to go 9 contracts deep, so let's say I'll quit if my account size falls to $20k. In that case, I can still survive 44 consecutive losing trades.
Now I'm not trying to get cocky. I do occasionally have losers that are big, but also sometimes they are smaller, depending on the range I establish before I enter the trade.
And as I mentioned in the other thread, for any given trade, the max winner is larger than the max loser.
Well dude, if that happens, I will send you a PM and tell you you were right. How about that![]()
Quote from icarus618:
Consider a leveraged market like the ES. $400 avg/day on a $50,000 account means the person doesn't know what he's doing or he has most of the account sitting idle while he's trading.
A lot of people here will be hostile to that viewpoint. That's just par for the course. Most everyone on ET doesn't make anything from trading.
In Theory and it is simple mathQuote from TraderZones:
Throw in risk of ruin, errors, taxes and other things, and it is beyond ludicrous for people to "expect" this kind of return.
