Astrological Theory of Markets Cycles.

So ...can we start the contest? RCG verses Suryananda?

Trade calls must be made least 48 hours in advance complete with Entries, Stop Losses and Take Profits for Forex.

ES
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

So ...can we start the contest? RCG verses Suryananda?

Trade calls must be made least 48 hours in advance complete with Entries, Stop Losses and Take Profits for Forex.

ES
More...

Did not I always have done so?

Why so much bigotry against astrology? If most know nothing about astrology!
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

So ...can we start the contest? RCG verses Suryananda?

Trade calls must be made least 48 hours in advance complete with Entries, Stop Losses and Take Profits for Forex.

ES
More...

It is not about a trading contest per se. But if he wants we can compare methods, I never mind this. What I am going to prove is that Astro is superfluous to chart reading, and that price will determine all we really need to know.

Im game for some comparative analysis. And btw OP, I do know a lot about Astro. In fact, I can cast charts.

Astro is not the cause, it is a correlation, and that correlation is spurious.
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

So ...can we start the contest? RCG verses Suryananda?

Trade calls must be made least 48 hours in advance complete with Entries, Stop Losses and Take Profits for Forex.

ES
More...

48 hours in advace might be a bit of problem as well for me, as I operate bar by bar. I do not know what the market will do until it gets there. Entries will be bar by bar, SL is fine, take profit will be bar by bar.

My current trade was entered at 330 this morning CST, USA, at 130.27 on the pound/yen pair. I have moved my stop up to 129.98. The market has not told me to consider taking profit yet.
 
First off, if your making money with your methods, fantastic! Who cares what others think.

But I think part of the problem is that when you correctly call a trade you put up charts showing that you nailed the call.

But when a call goes against you, like the Dow call you made, it seems that there is silence. Just my two cents ...
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

It is not about a trading contest per se. But if he wants we can compare methods, I never mind this. What I am going to prove is that Astro is superfluous to chart reading, and that price will determine all we really need to know.

Im game for some comparative analysis. And btw OP, I do know a lot about Astro. In fact, I can cast charts.

Astro is not the cause, it is a correlation, and that correlation is spurious.
More...
If you do not believe in astrology why waste your time going into this thread?

The mantra of the pseudo-rationalist clones:

"I do not believe in astrology ....
but I'm very interested in the astrological thread of Suryananda...

I do not believe in astrology
but I'm very interested in the astrological thread of Suryananda...

I do not...."

And forever ........

I'm bored with the mantra of the clones.
 
Quote from Jack Nestle:

First off, if your making money with your methods, fantastic! Who cares what others think.

But I think part of the problem is that when you correctly call a trade you put up charts showing that you nailed the call.

But when a call goes against you, like the Dow call you made, it seems that there is silence. Just my two cents ...
More...

You do not do well the accounts.

In this thread I made predictions 4 weeks with 8 hits of cable and 1 single failure in the Dow Jones (YM) with stop loss at break-even.

Win/loss = 8 / 0
Hits/failure = 8/1
Draw down = ZERO.
Pip = lot
 
Quote from Suryananda:

If you do not believe in astrology why waste your time going into this thread?

The mantra of the pseudo-rationalist clones:

"I do not believe in astrology ....
but I'm very interested in the astrological thread of Suryananda...

I do not believe in astrology
but I'm very interested in the astrological thread of Suryananda...

I do not...."

And forever ........

I'm bored with the mantra of the clones.
More...

It's called "peer review". I am a skeptical peer. I do not think your correlation will stand up under scrutiny, and further, you seem to fear it, so that only adds doubt to an already shaky theory.

Astro is a spurious correlation. It is inferior to chart reading, plain and simple. You do not show bar by bar analysis. You do not show entries, you do not show stops. you do not show targets.
 
Don't you see? Peer review is for pseudo-rationalist clones; The scientific process is for pseudo-rationalist clones; Skepticism is for pseudo-rationalist clones; Correlation is for pseudo-rationalist clones;

Our man Suryananda is the only non-pseudo superstitious individual here.... (I think that's what he means him self to be, as an opposite of being one of the pseudo-rationalist clones)

Quote from RCG Trader:

It's called "peer review". I am a skeptical peer. I do not think your correlation will stand up under scrutiny, and further, you seem to fear it, so that only adds doubt to an already shaky theory.

Astro is a spurious correlation. It is inferior to chart reading, plain and simple. You do not show bar by bar analysis. You do not show entries, you do not show stops. you do not show targets.
More...
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

It's called "peer review". I am a skeptical peer. I do not think your correlation will stand up under scrutiny, and further, you seem to fear it, so that only adds doubt to an already shaky theory.

Astro is a spurious correlation. It is inferior to chart reading, plain and simple. You do not show bar by bar analysis. You do not show entries, you do not show stops. you do not show targets.
More...
I understand you well.

But not waste your time on this thread I'm not going to explain any of my system.

By personal message I have explained to some people, but not publicly in this thread full of trolls.

The trolls made me change my initial intentions.

Best wishes and good luck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top