Arizona shooter had ties to far right white nationalist group
- Thread starter epiktetos
- Start date
STOP STALKING ME AND OTHER ET MEMBERS !!!!!!!!!!
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=210078&perpage=6&pagenumber=5
Point out to me where I said any of this. Bunch of random strawman with lots of exclamation marks, boy you are a perfect spokesman for the 'white race'.
And its funny white nationalists and supermacists talking about whining, that's just hilarious.
Here is one scholarly study I found at Amren, nothing racist about it ofcourse, calling for segregation along racial lines can not be racism.
Integration Has Failed
http://www.amren.com/ar/2008/02/index.html
This from DeRanged Rover who reacted to a shooting by a nutcase by getting angry and slandering Sarah Palin. 
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3057499#post3057499
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3057499#post3057499
Funny, last night someone, I could be wrong but I suspect Landis82, complained to Joe I was "stalking" them. In reality of course all I'm really doing is pointing out his stupidity. Apparently the individual wants the equivalent of an internet retraining order, so he can continue posting stupid shit unchallenged. As if that would somehow make his posts more true and accurate.Another example of a cowardly leftist wanting/trying to hide behind "authority", because they're too weak to defend themselves or their publicly displayed stupidity.
Way to start whining and crying because you couldn't actually refute my points... Don't worry, it wasn't REALLY noticeable or anything...
Whoever said I am a white nationalist or white supremacist? I am neither. How do you know I am even white?
I don't believe that was a "study". It was more of an opinion peace. What it called for was freedom of association, as opposed to forced, mandatory integration. I completely agree with this position on libertarian grounds. People already usually segregate racially when they are free to do so, for the most part. Just go look at a jail, the lunch room or playground of a 'multicultural' school, most nighclubs, hell even most neighborhoods. A small minority are intermixed. On the bi or tri racial playground, white kids playing in the black crowd and vice versa are the outlier. How many white people live in predominantly black areas? Maybe a few, but it's very unusual. The point is that people segregate themselves in most cases and legislation of mandatory integration runs counter stream to human nature. Human nature, is that most people are most comfortable around, prefer to surround themselves with, and mate with, people like themselves, and there's nothing wrong, hateful, or "racist" about that. To have a preference or affinity for your own race, doesn't mean you hate others. Most other races are free to express this preference for their own people and affinity for their own culture ( Black entertainment television, latino students union). It's only when whites organize along racial lines that it is "hateful" or "racist".
I agree, not with mandatory segregation, but with the right to voluntary segregation and complete freedom of association, which we now do not have. I agree with it on Libertarian grounds. I find it ironic that you haven't chosen to persecute many of the black and latino groups which have called for segregation in neighborhoods, schools, and have even expressed desires and made plans for secession ("reconqiusta " for the latinos and "new africa" in the south for blacks). Why is it you get so angry about white people holding conferences and publishing magazines, but you aren't worried about these other racially based groups which are a lot more extreme? Kind of a double standard don't you think? Personally, I'm fine with them segregating their schools, businesses, communities if that's what they chose to do. I just ask that the same freedom be extended to all other racial groups.
Whoever said I am a white nationalist or white supremacist? I am neither. How do you know I am even white?
I don't believe that was a "study". It was more of an opinion peace. What it called for was freedom of association, as opposed to forced, mandatory integration. I completely agree with this position on libertarian grounds. People already usually segregate racially when they are free to do so, for the most part. Just go look at a jail, the lunch room or playground of a 'multicultural' school, most nighclubs, hell even most neighborhoods. A small minority are intermixed. On the bi or tri racial playground, white kids playing in the black crowd and vice versa are the outlier. How many white people live in predominantly black areas? Maybe a few, but it's very unusual. The point is that people segregate themselves in most cases and legislation of mandatory integration runs counter stream to human nature. Human nature, is that most people are most comfortable around, prefer to surround themselves with, and mate with, people like themselves, and there's nothing wrong, hateful, or "racist" about that. To have a preference or affinity for your own race, doesn't mean you hate others. Most other races are free to express this preference for their own people and affinity for their own culture ( Black entertainment television, latino students union). It's only when whites organize along racial lines that it is "hateful" or "racist".
I agree, not with mandatory segregation, but with the right to voluntary segregation and complete freedom of association, which we now do not have. I agree with it on Libertarian grounds. I find it ironic that you haven't chosen to persecute many of the black and latino groups which have called for segregation in neighborhoods, schools, and have even expressed desires and made plans for secession ("reconqiusta " for the latinos and "new africa" in the south for blacks). Why is it you get so angry about white people holding conferences and publishing magazines, but you aren't worried about these other racially based groups which are a lot more extreme? Kind of a double standard don't you think? Personally, I'm fine with them segregating their schools, businesses, communities if that's what they chose to do. I just ask that the same freedom be extended to all other racial groups.
Quote from Lucrum:
Another example of a cowardly leftist wanting/trying to hide behind "authority", because they're too weak to defend themselves or their publicly displayed stupidity.
Landis used to stalk me by sending me private messages to let me know he responded to me in a thread.
I like Landis but he got a little goofy with all the private messages...
Landis is a hypocrite extraordinaire. He stalks you - but complains of stalking when others respond to his posts. He TRIES to make issue of posting in this forum - but does it himself. He TRIES to make issue of post quantity - but posts more frequently himself than the one he's complaining about. He acts as if he's the only real trader on ET - but so far as I know has never participated in the Journals P&L thread.
He's a putz - pure and simple.
Exactly. And just like they're trying to shut down free speech with their bullshit about the shooter's motives, libturds think they can shut down criticism of their lies by hiding behind yet more phony accusations.
Quote from Lucrum:
Another example of a cowardly leftist wanting/trying to hide behind "authority", because they're too weak to defend themselves or their publicly displayed stupidity.